Is This Any Way To Deconstruct the Triad?

More gloom from the E-ring...

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta writes Congress that the “doomsday” cuts that will befall the Defense Department if sequestration occurs will force the military to eliminate one of the legs of its strategic nuclear triad – as if this is a bad thing.

The triad – that collection of land-based missiles, bombers and submarine-launched missiles – is going away. It was overkill during the Cold War, and its value-added utility today is marginal. Budget pressures, if not forward-looking military thinking, will render it obsolete. The only question is when – and how – it will happen. Far better that the Pentagon choose to scale back the triad instead of having it forced down its missile tubes by some fiscal calamity.

Panetta, in an addendum to Monday’s letter, confirms the Air Force’s land-based missile leg will be the one to if deep budget cuts come, and that doing so will save $8 billion over the coming decade:

“Eliminate ICBM leg of Triad,” it notes. “($8B).”

Related Topics: Air Force, Leon Panetta, Military, National Security, Nuclear Weapons, Pentagon
  • Latest on Battleland

    Getty

    Trash Talk…

    Trash can be deadly. You can get a hint of that from the contract solicitation issued Tuesday by the Defense Logistics Agency’s European disposition office seeking “hazardous waste services in southwest Asia.”

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Firefight Along Highway 1

    Reuters

    Americans Choose Up Sides — Japan Over China

    TOKYO – Maybe it’s sympathy from last year’s triple disasters or maybe it’s just China being China. But for what it’s worth, Americans increasingly view Japan as its most important ally in Asia.

blog comments powered by Disqus