The Game-Changer in Libya: Time

These guys might have made the Libya campaign fast
U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Joshua Boley, left, a tactical air control party member with the 3rd Air Support Operations Squadron and U.S. Army Pfc. Joshua LeJeune, a joint fire observer with the 1st Battalion? 501st Infantry Regiment, conduct joint terminal attack and joint fire observer training during Northern Edge 2011 at Donnelly Training Area, Alaska, June 14, 2011. Northern Edge is an annual joint training exercise designed to test military and civilian response and coordination capabilities while enhancing the command, control and communications relationships associated with joint operations. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Lakisha Croley/Released)

The game-changer in terms of effective NATO air support for the Libyan rebels was time. That’s because it took months for NATO to re-create a coalition-style precision air strike campaign similar to what the United States leads daily in places like Afghanistan.

Battleland has talked about the air war above Libya with U.S. officials who have coordinated the air wars over Iraq and Afghanistan as well as those who have participated in running the Libya campaign from Naples. Both said NATO had to basically reinvent the air-war wheel.

After ten years of air-strike-heavy combat, the United States has honed the precision air strike to a fine art. The United States can coordinate a ballet of legions of aircraft from the Combined Air Operations Center in the Middle East. Predator drones humming above the battlefield give ground commanders and their air support a consistent, birds-eye view of the battle space. Meanwhile, Joint Terminal Attack Controllers on the ground traveling with ground troops can guide pilots in the air to extremely precise strikes with the aid of lasers or GPS coordinates. That’s why a Special Forces A-Team can take on a lot of Taliban and U.S. forces can often blast their way out of being overrun.

But President Obama ordered that the U.S. not put boots on the ground in Libya — not even small teams staffed with JTAC folks. That job has been left to the British and French who now have their elite forces on the ground helping to coordinate the air war. That took time to set up. NATO also had to forge relationships with rebel elements to get accurate intelligence flowing to Naples. And finally, the United States had to commit to moving enough Predator drones into the battle space to make a difference there, even if it meant stealing the drones from someplace else where those aircraft might be sorely needed.

Yes, it would have been faster and perhaps more effective for the United States to just effectively expand the air war from Afghanistan to Libya and insert a handful of operators to guide precision strikes. But the president insisted this was a NATO party, and it took some time for NATO to send out the invites.

Related Topics: Libya
  • Latest on Battleland

    Navy Photo / MSC 3rd Class Alex R. Forster

    Persian Sunset

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

blog comments powered by Disqus