Libya’s Non-Practical Endgame

When an airplane stops flying fast enough to generate the lift it needs to stay aloft, pilots call it a stall. We tend to call it a crash. That’s what has happened to the Libyan rebels in the last 36 hours or so. Their triumphant ride into Tripoli has crashed onto the pockets of tenacious resistance still occupied by those loyal to longtime Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. While that’s apparently only about 20% of the city, it includes Gaddafi’s compound, Bab al-Aziziya, in the middle of the capital.

It’s a challenge as old as war: once invaders have the still-beating heart of the enemy surrounded, what course is best? With a growing edge in firepower and the compound surrounded, the rebels could take it by force, lobbing mortars inside and bombing it into dust. Or they could simply lay siege to the place, and wait out its occupants until they run out of food, fuel and water. This could be the real test. NATO spokesman Col. Roland Lavoie just said it will not be “practical” for the allies to provide close-air support — helicopter gunships and A-10 warplanes, for example — to aid the rebels in their bid to take the compound and other areas still held by Gaddafi’s forces. Whoever said war was “practical”?

Related Topics: Libya, Military, National Security, NATO
  • Latest on Battleland

    Navy Photo / MSC 3rd Class Alex R. Forster

    Persian Sunset

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

blog comments powered by Disqus