Length of Army Combat Tours Decreased

By Mark Benjamin | August 5, 2011 | +

Army combat tours will be three months shorter. Better than nothing.

A U.S. Soldier, left, from 3rd Platoon, Chosen Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, meets a village leader to discuss his needs in a village near Combat Outpost Conlon, Wardak province, Afganistan, June 8, 2010. (U.S. Army photo by Jon Rosa/Released)

There is some good new in the world. This ain’t the biggest deal, but we’ll take it.

The Army will reduce the length of many combat deployments from 12 months to 9 months. This is also down from the height of the Iraq war, when many soldiers spent 15 months at war. The shortened tours don’t begin until early 2012 and don’t apply to units that deploy before then.

Also, Army Secretary John McHugh says that “high demand and low density units and individual deployers” will still go to war for a year at a time. Sorry folks.

While it is “only” three months less, its hard to imagine how big a deal that is go a guy or gal at some isolated FOB in Afghanistan.

Related Topics: Army

@TIME

Latest on Battleland

Afghanistan May 21, 2012

Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

Missile Defense May 21, 2012

House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

Military Spending May 21, 2012

The Pentagon’s “Washington Monument Strategy”

Whenever federal bureaucrats running the nation’s parks get antsy that their purse is likely to shrink, they roll out something long known as the “Washington Monument strategy.” That’s the tried-and-true technique of warning the public that if money isn’t forthcoming, one of the first budget cuts will force the shutting down of the popular obelisk to Washington, D.C., tourists.