Defense Cuts in the Name of Debt Reduction But Really for Food Stamps, Basic Research & Student Loans

The defense spending “debate” seems to be devolving into a race to the bottom. With trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see—and a collision with the debt ceiling scheduled in less than two weeks—panicky politicians are coalescing around a simple yet dangerous idea:  doubling-down—perhaps even tripling-down—on already severed military spending cuts.

This week, President Obama made his priorities clear:  social spending trumps national security. “A lot of the spending cuts that we’re making should be around areas like defense spending as opposed to food stamps,” he told NPR.


Ironically, no domestic program can exist or operate if the nation is not protected.

Yet clearly the president views the defense budget as a piggy bank to be raided for other purposes.  And if you thought “other purposes” means debt reduction, think again.

Earlier this month during his Twitter town hall, the president observed that “the nice thing about the defense budget is it’s so big … that you can make relatively modest changes to defense that end up giving you a lot of head room to fund things like basic research or student loans or things like that.”

Very few politicians want to fund a strong defense … until they need it. But you cannot maintain a military with global reach through boom and bust funding cycles. Any money you “save” during the bust is spent when budgets go up again due to rising threats and challenges.

Thankfully, some members of Congress are still trying to hold the line and ensure no defense cuts are made without careful discussion of threats around the world and risks toAmerica’s security.

Nearly 50 members of Congress, including the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, reminded the president this week:

“We are a nation at war with men and women fighting in harm’s way on multiple fronts. We need to ensure that the soldiers of this nation are well equipped with every resource they need to protect the liberties we all enjoy.”

They went on to say that national resolve starts at the top:

“We need to send a clear message to the men and women fighting for our nation that this Congress will not sit by while your Administration makes unjustified decisions about defense funding.”

Unfortunately, our commander-in-chief seems more interested in playing student-lending-in chief.

Related Topics: Congress, Military, National Security, Pentagon, Politics, President Obama
  • Latest on Battleland

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

    Photo by Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

    The Pentagon’s “Washington Monument Strategy”

    Whenever federal bureaucrats running the nation’s parks get antsy that their purse is likely to shrink, they roll out something long known as the “Washington Monument strategy.” That’s the tried-and-true technique of warning the public that if money isn’t forthcoming, one of the first budget cuts will force the shutting down of the popular obelisk to Washington, D.C., tourists.

blog comments powered by Disqus