Pakistanis, Indians, and the U.S. Taxpayer

Pakistan, you may have heard, is finding it challenging to battle the friendly (to them) Taliban forces on its soil that only cross into Afghanistan to kill U.S. troops (the Pakistanis have no compunction about killing the other Taliban — those trying to topple the government in Islamabad). So it was interesting to see the Government Accountability Office release a report Tuesday with a chart detailing just what kinds of weapons U.S. taxpayers have been giving — giving, not selling — the Pakistani government since 2002.

None of the big-ticket items — F-16 jet improvements, maritime patrol aircraft, a frigate, anti-tank missiles and launchers, self-propelled howitzers — would seem to have much application in anti-Taliban warfare. But they might come in handy for the war against India that Pakistan is forever predicting. Just don’t understand why we’re footing the bill.

Update: Reader Joe Katzman notes that some of these items are what you might call “dual-use” technologies. In the old days, that meant they had both military and civilian applications. Today, it might mean they can be used for two kinds of warfare. He points out that, among other things, maritime aircraft are being used over land to track bad guys, and that anti-tank missiles work against caves as well.

Related Topics: Afghanistan, Counter-Insurgency, Development, Foreign Policy, India, Military, National Security, Pakistan, Pentagon, Weapons
  • Latest on Battleland

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

    Photo by Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

    The Pentagon’s “Washington Monument Strategy”

    Whenever federal bureaucrats running the nation’s parks get antsy that their purse is likely to shrink, they roll out something long known as the “Washington Monument strategy.” That’s the tried-and-true technique of warning the public that if money isn’t forthcoming, one of the first budget cuts will force the shutting down of the popular obelisk to Washington, D.C., tourists.

blog comments powered by Disqus