If U.S. Wants to Steer Global Rules on Drones, It Needs to Dominate Global Sales

Made in USA, so why not sold worldwide?

Financial Times story last week (US urged to rethink export controls on drones) re: Paris Air Show cites multiple US defense corporate sources complaining that unless the US Government lifts some of the restrictions, the world’s “insatiable appetite” for drones will be exploited by other nations’ military-industrial complexes. The big issue? The drones are treated under the Missile Technology Control Regime, which is fairly strict and expensive to appeal when decisions go against you.

For a government that wants to cut a lot of defense spending while maintaining industrial base and technological leads, this is a self-defeating path. We’re – yet again – obsessing over nukes (20th century problem) and letting that restrict our strategic vision right when we’re trying to get poorer allies to do more for themselves. Well, drones are cheap and effective and self-empowering in a good, transparent way. Plus, the more that are out there and the more they’re used, the less acrimonious the international response when we continue to use ours vigorously.  Also, as bad guys and private sector entities inevitably stock up, we’ll need rules/responses to govern that reality.  The faster and wider the proliferation, the faster those rules come. Win-win-win-win.

Congress needs to move on this because our “world without nukes” White House will not.

Related Topics: defense budget, drones, weapons sales, Arms sales, Congress, Drones, Weapons
  • Latest on Battleland

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

    Photo by Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

    The Pentagon’s “Washington Monument Strategy”

    Whenever federal bureaucrats running the nation’s parks get antsy that their purse is likely to shrink, they roll out something long known as the “Washington Monument strategy.” That’s the tried-and-true technique of warning the public that if money isn’t forthcoming, one of the first budget cuts will force the shutting down of the popular obelisk to Washington, D.C., tourists.

blog comments powered by Disqus