Afghanistan: Perception v. Will

U.S. troops in Zabul Province, Afghanistan, earlier this month / DoD photo by Brian Ferguson
U.S. Army Spc. Daniel Miller (left) and Spc. Daniel Scott, both assigned to the Zabul Provincial Reconstruction Team security force, provide security as members of the team make their way to a canal project site in Zabul province, Afghanistan, on June 14, 2011. DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Brian Ferguson, U.S. Air Force. (Released)

War remains forever about perceptions, absent the signing of instruments of surrender.

Last week: “We’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban,” President Obama declared as he announced U.S. troops will start coming home next month.

Last night: nine Taliban suicide bombers stormed one of the most posh and protected hotels in Kabul, killing 11 before they themselves were killed.

There are debates now underway inside the Pentagon over the logic of the attack on the Intercontinental Hotel.

Most likely, officials say, the Taliban carried it out to highlight the futility of additional U.S. efforts in Afghanistan, signaling a resolve to keep attacking as the U.S. drawdown gets underway.

Americans are likely to sigh and shake their heads over such wanton destruction. They will wonder anew if there is anything the world’s best military force can do to change the soil in which the Taliban ideology — and the tribal Afghan politics that nurture it — has been rooted for centuries.

War isn’t only about perceptions, of course. Like the Tet offensive against South Vietnam in January 1968, the attackers lost in Kabul in a military sense. But the perception (there’s that word again) is likely to be that the Taliban — like the Viet Cong — have the will to fight, no matter what the odds. And if there is one thing that trumps perception in war, it is will.

Related Topics: Afghanistan, Military, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

    Only One Year of U.S.-Led Fighting Left

    President Obama’s goal at the NATO summit this week is looking increasingly clear: wrap up U.S. troops’ combat role over the coming year, and get the allies to pay more money to enable the Afghan military to fill the gap.

    Getty Images

    House Pushes for East Coast Missile Shield

    The House has approved a $643 billion defense-spending bill for 2013 that’s $3.7 billion more than the Obama Administration, and its Pentagon, is seeking. That’s just about the same amount the Congressional Budget Office estimates the House bill’s push for an East Coast missile shield will cost over the next five years.

    Photo by Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

    The Pentagon’s “Washington Monument Strategy”

    Whenever federal bureaucrats running the nation’s parks get antsy that their purse is likely to shrink, they roll out something long known as the “Washington Monument strategy.” That’s the tried-and-true technique of warning the public that if money isn’t forthcoming, one of the first budget cuts will force the shutting down of the popular obelisk to Washington, D.C., tourists.

blog comments powered by Disqus