Speaking, as we just did, of military-spending reviews, Time has a compelling piece in its latest issue detailing just how the nation could save $1 trillion out of the $7 trillion it is planning to spend on military forces over the coming decade. The author asserts real cuts will not happen until the White House and Congress get the guts to curtail some of the current missions of the U.S. military. As someone who recently traded in a sedan for a sportier car, I can confirm for my Pentagon pals that, sometimes, smaller is better. Amazingly, there was a similar Pentagon story in Time almost exactly three decades ago. Only it was called “How To Spend a Trillion,” which should give you some hint of defense spending’s direction since the Cold War’s end.
-
-
Full ListMost Popular
- Battleland Diary, May 5-11
- U.S. Casualties Drop Sharply in Afghanistan
- F-22 Gets Into a Dogfight as Panetta Crimps Its Flight Envelope
- 2012 Military Spouse of the Year
- Waiting for Bowe: America’s Last Captured Soldier
- Dry British F-35 Humour
- Women in Direct Ground Combat? Not Quite Yet
- The English Pilot
- Why It is Time to Clean the Pentagon’s Augean Stables
- Apparently, the F-35 Isn’t Everyone’s Cup of Airpower
- Mitchell Guist, 'Swamp People' Cast Member, Dies
- Will JPMorgan's $2 Billion Blunder Finally End 'Too Big to Fail'?
- Beam Them Up, Scotty: Chinese Physicists Reportedly Break Teleportation Record
- For China, Economic Growth Doesn't Always Equal Happiness
- Behind the Cover: Are You Mom Enough?
- White Elephants on Parade: The Unloved New Castles in Spain
- The Man Who Remade Motherhood
- Iran's Tough Nuclear Stance Masks Struggles
- The Best Book I've Ever Read
- Jay-Z Backs Obama's Endorsement of Gay Marriage
-
-
VideosMore Videos
-








