Libya: What’s a Superpower To Do?

An unexploded cluster bomblet allegedly dropped on Misurata / Human Rights Watch

Hard to imagine a more striking pair of stories to define Battleland’s mission than a pair this morning – one on the front page of the Washington Post, and the second on Page 1 of the New York Times. They’re flip sides of the same coin, and get to the heart of the debate I hope we can have here.

The Post‘s grim headline says it all:

NATO’s Bomb Supply Is Running Short

Doubts raised over whether U.S. can continue to stay out of Libyan air campaign

The piece, by the top-drawer reporting pair of Karen DeYoung and Greg Jaffe, basically says that the best way to stop Muammar Gaddafi from slaughtering innocents inside his own country is to get large numbers of U.S. warplanes back into the fight. Our  allies, including key NATO members, it seems, lack the precision of U.S. firepower. Of course, the U.S. has plenty to share – why not just give the Europeans some? “Although the United States has significant stockpiles, its munitions do not fit on the British- and French-made planes that have flown the bulk of the missions,” the Post reports. And. These. Are. Our. Closest. Allies.

If such news galls you, better steer clear of C.J. Chivers’ chilling Times piece from the rebel-held Libyan city of Misurata:

Military forces loyal to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi have been firing into residential neighborhoods in this embattled city with heavy weapons, including cluster bombs that have been banned by much of the world and ground-to-ground rockets, according to witnesses and survivors, as well as physical evidence. Both of these so-called indiscriminate weapons, which strike large areas with a dense succession of high-explosive munitions, by their nature cannot be fired precisely. When fired into populated areas, they place civilians at grave risk. The dangers were evident beside one of the impact craters on Friday, where eight people had been killed while standing in a bread line. Where a crowd had assembled for food, bits of human flesh had been blasted against a cinder-block wall.

OK. That’s where we are right now. That’s the hand we’ve been dealt. What, if anything, should the U.S. do?

Related Topics: cluster bombs, Libya, Military, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • mhissong

    Can we see the enemy from the air? I would think cluster bomb launchers would be easily spotted, but I don’t know. If these cluster bomb launchers can be spotted, we should take them out. There has been much dithering over our allies’ lack of precision ordinance. We still have some, right? And the required precision of ordinance varies according to surroundings and the threat of the targeted installations/units. If NOT taking the units out would result in massive casualties… then if they can’t be taken out cleanly, doing so uncleanly may be necessary. It’s about tallying lives. Of course, weighing what effect that would have on reporting and the rest of the mission in Libya is difficult.

blog comments powered by Disqus