Gaddafi Not Even a Target, Never Mind a Bullseye

Muammar Gaddafi -- This U.S. Tomahawk is NOT aimed at you / DoD photo

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi concluded Sunday that 48 hours of bombing by allied warplanes and missiles are plenty, and called for a ceasefire – even as U.S. and allied leaders made it clear that removing him from the job he has held for 42 years isn’t a goal of Operation Odyssey Dawn.

Pentagon officials, noting that an earlier ceasefire announced by Gaddafi’s government ceased to exist, said they would press on until actions demonstrated Gaddafi had stopped attacking his opponents. But they stressed they are not out for the Libyan leader.

“We are not going after Gaddafi,” Vice Adm. William Gortney, director of operations for the Pentagon’s joint staff, said Sunday afternoon, even as smoke rose from the compound housing the Libyan leader’s headquarters. “At this particular point, I can guarantee that he’s not on a targeting list.”

As Defense Secretary Robert Gates flew toward Russia Sunday – a trip delayed by a day so he could supervise the launch of U.S.-led attacks on Libya – he said expanding the UN resolution to include removing Gaddafi would be a mistake. “If we start adding additional objectives, then I think we create a problem in that respect,” Gates said. “I also think that it is unwise to set as specific goals things that you may or may not be able to achieve.”

It seems a strange guarantee from a mission whose endgame is as smoky as that rising from Gaddafi’s compound. Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, told NBC’s Meet the Press that Gaddafi’s continued hold on power is “certainly potentially one outcome.” French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, asked if the bombings are meant to drive Gaddafi from power, responded: “No. The plan is to help Libyans choose their future.”

Lawmakers said they were uncertain of the U.S. military’s mission. “Are our goals aimed at protecting civilians in Libya, or the removal of Muammar Gaddafi from power?” asked Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., chairman of the armed services committee. “In either case, to what extent and for how long will military resources be utilized?”

Allowing Gaddafi to remain in power – after President Obama declared on March 3 that he “must leave” – seems likely only to prolong the confrontation. U.S. officials suggest the public declarations that Gaddafi’s ouster is not a goal gives the Libyan leader some wiggle room – although they’re betting he would be taken out, one way or another, by internal foes in the wake of the attacks.

But U.S. officials, speaking privately, said the lack of a target on Gaddafi’s back was part of the log-rolling necessary to win approval of UN Resolution No. 1973 calling for the military action. They noted that previous leaders targeted by the U.S. – Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic, Mohammed Omar and Osama bin Laden among them – have wound up in prison, in hiding, or dead.

Nineteen U.S. warplanes on Sunday followed up on Saturday’s Tomahawk strikes. Everything from Air Force B-2 bombers, to F-15 and F-16 fighter-bombers, to ship-based Marine AV-8B Harrier jump-jets hammered assorted Libyan targets, U.S. officials said. Four British Tornado jets also participated. Navy EA-18 Growlers scrambled Libyan electronic communications by to keep the skies as safe as possible for the bombing runs.

Mullen said “operations yesterday went very well” on NBC. “I would say the no-fly zone is effectively in place,” Mullen added on CNN’s State of the Union. Libyan TV said 64 people had been killed, and more than 150 wounded in the allied strikes. Mullen told CNN: “I’ve seen no reports of significant civilian casualties.”

Gaddafi, huddled in some bunker somewhere, telephoned Libyan television and declared the strikes were launched against his nation by “the new Nazis” and pledged “a long-drawn war.” He denounced the allied force as “terrorists” attacking a nation that did nothing to warrant such action. “You have proven to the world that you are not civilized, that you are terrorists — animals attacking a safe nation that did nothing against you.”

The U.S., for its part, has made clear its involvement in the conflict’s opening phase will be followed by a smaller, supporting role, as it lets France, Britain and Arab nations do the bulk of the fighting after the no-fly zone is fully in place. “We agreed to use our unique capabilities…at the front end of this process [and] expected in a matter of days to be able to turn over the primary responsibility to others,” Gates said en route to Moscow. “We will continue to support the coalition, be a member of the coalition, we will have a military role in the coalition but we will not have a preeminent role.” Qatar is expected to fly four warplanes in support of the no-fly-zone soon, giving the assault its first Arab participation.

 

Related Topics: gaddafi, libya, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • libssd

    French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, asked if the bombings are meant to drive Gaddafi from power, responded: “No. The plan is to help Libyans choose their future.”
    .
    The French have a plan??? Incroyable!

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Come on, sing it with me now!

  • afguy

    Gaddafi Not Even a Target, Never Mind a Bullseye
    .
    Because OPENLY sanctioned assassination of another head-of-state is a bridge NO ONE is willing to cross – at least officially. If an “accident” happens (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)… that’s another matter entirely.
    .
    Been that way for a very LONG time. Too many countries have the military capability and weaponry to take out ANY other politician at ANY time.
    .
    Don’t want to open THAT “can of worms”.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Judging by where things are blowing up, seems safe to say they aren’t exactly trying to miss him, either. And what about the part of the UN resolution that prevents Libyan registered planes from landing in other member states? Seems like they don’t want him or his family escaping to safety.

  • abdullah69

    If Reagan had had the technology the US has now, then Gaddafi would be dead by now. This is the problem the defence industry faces. How to keep enemies alive long enough to prove weapons systems need to be improved, but not too long that they are declared ineffective.

  • apr2563

    Via Al Jazeera:
    .
    Yemen President fires his cabinet.
    Yemen’s NW Military deploys units to protect protestors
    60% military back protestors
    .
    http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/

  • apr2563

    I find it intresting that the envoys and ambassadors serving from Middle East countries ensconced in foreign countries side with the protestors when things get a little to hot. Because they are safe and out of the line of fire suddenly see the light.
    I think the same can be said of the military in those countries.

  • michaelfury

    “Tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq: Your enemy is not surrounding your country – your enemy is ruling your country. And the day he and his regime are removed from power will be the day of your liberation.”

    - President George W. Bush

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/enemies-list/

  • libssd

    “They’re trying to kill me,” Yossarian told him calmly.
    No one’s trying to kill you,” Clevinger cried.
    Then why are they shooting at me?” Yossarian asked.
    They’re shooting at everyone,” Clevinger answered. “They’re trying to kill everyone.”
    And what difference does that make?”
    — Joseph Heller (Catch 22)

  • bobell

    “Vunce zey go up, who cares vhere zey come down.
    Dot’s not my depottment,” says Werner von Braun

    – Tom Lehrer

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Who’s next?

    – Tom Lehrer

  • nflfoghorn

    Do f-bombs go together with a-bombs?

  • libssd

    W had the technology, used it against Saddam, and missed. I think it’s a reasonable assumption that Qaddafi isn’t sleeping in any of his “usual places” during the current unpleasantness.

  • afguy

    Which pretty well renders “smart bombs” by themselves useless.
    .
    You’re now into a “boots on the ground” and “good intelligence” realm.
    .
    That, and the ability to strike on a few moments notice.
    .
    Not just LAUNCH one, mind you… the entire ball of wax… completion included.

  • liberalmeltdown

    French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, asked if the bombings are meant to drive Gaddafi from power, responded: “No. The plan is to help Libyans choose their future.”
    .
    Someone pass him the memo: It’s “Winning the Future.”

blog comments powered by Disqus