Is al Qaeda History?

As an unprecedented sirocco sweeps across North Africa and the Middle East, something amazing is happening: al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden are being left behind in the dust. Neither Islamic fundamentalism nor hatred of Israel or the United States is generating this force. Young people, linked as never before by technology that didn’t exist a decade ago, are in the driver’s seat. They want education and good jobs, and seem to have no desire to oppress their mothers, sisters and wives, or impose sharia law.  It’s too early to feel giddy. But what’s hatching in that part of the world has a lot to do with nascent democracy, and little to do with the brand of Islam peddled by bin Laden. Scott Shane elaborates in today’s New York Times.

Related Topics: Al Qaeda, bin laden, libya, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • afguy

    Of course not!
    .
    Who do you think is going to be needed to justify the next-generation drone or surveillance equipment in the “war on Terra™”?
    .
    The MIC NEEDS an enema enemy!

  • Matt

    It;s possible al Qaeda could have always been “history”; the US government and press just wouldn’t accept that judgment. bin Laden’s brand of radical Islam was never a giant force shaping events on the grounds in most of the Muslim world .Even the Islamists that gained support were never directly linked to Qaeda or bin Laden’s violent ideology. This wave of economically-based unrest has been building for some time. We were just too consumed with the “war on terror” to ever acknowledge it.
    http://www.sunstateactivist.org

  • afguy

    We HAVE to have a “face” to put on our enemies.
    .
    Bin Laden fit that need perfectly. Otherwise, we’d have to get all worked up over a faceless “cause”.
    .
    That’s REALLY hard to put into a marketing campaign.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    Do you mean is the endless,baseless fearmongering going to still be credible?
    .
    I thought Shane was hilarious this morning. I didn’t read past the jump. But this was classic:
    .

    So for Al Qaeda — and perhaps no less for the American policies that have been built around the threat it poses — the democratic revolutions that have gripped the world’s attention present a crossroads. Will the terrorist network shrivel slowly to irrelevance?

    .
    It has been irrelevant for at least the last 6 years.
    .
    And good reporting by a committed journalistic community would have made that clear long ago. The question is not whether it will shrivel away. The question is whether the stenography will continue.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    You know, afguy, choosing that cover to illustrate the post was, I think unintentionally, revealing.
    .
    And you recall the face Stegel used to keep the flogging the Afghan war–the young woman whose nose had been cut off. On the US watch, mind you….

  • http://asdfjaskjda.wordpress.com dougjballoon

    I guess we need a new enemy to fight and fear.

    What do you think, China, North Korea, Mexico?

  • nflfoghorn

    Whio the heck are we fighting then? If we want OBL go over to Pakistan and get him! Sovereingty? Pffffft.

  • afguy

    Agreed, jay.
    .
    A big gray silhouette with a question mark in the middle just doesn’t get the juices flowing.

  • allthingsinaname

    More home grown, the GOP

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    Here’s to Somalia! Hip! Hip! Hooray?

  • Ivy_B

    Say it isn’t so.

    You mean they might stop feeling me up — patting me down rather — when I fly? Just when we were building up for more kabuki.

  • afguy

    Officially, it can’t be China. Although they ARE probably our next REAL enemy and SHOULD scare the teetotal h*ll out of us.
    .
    Their ability to damage to us for the forseeable future will be measured in economic wounds, not damage from a direct military attack. Their fingerprints are all over our economic ‘nads and I think they’ll squeeze when the need arises and they’re sure they can ride out any economic damage.
    .
    Our new “official” enemy has to be someone we can beat up on (at least on paper) but someone that will take a LOT of time (and military funding) to overcome. The more nebulous the benchmarks for “victory”, the better. That way, we can shift the goalposts without anyone really noticing.
    .
    Remember, we’re talking about a “long-term” need…

  • michaelfury
  • nflfoghorn

    Whio = who
    Unless a new definition of Ohio is needed ;)

  • michaelfury
  • 53_3

    Is the Tea Party history?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    al Qaeda isn’t important. They’ve never been important and their power was only that they were able to scare the bejeevies out of this entire country. They did their work rather well too considering that ten years later many on the right and a few on the left are still frightened that muslims are coming to get them.
    .
    I’ve said it before and I’ll keep saying, 9/11 was never about al Qaeda killing people. Death wasn’t their goal. Their goal was to frighten the living. That is the definition of terrorism and until we can go about living without references to bin Laden or the big bad Muslims or Sharia Law, they’ve won. Why does that seem so hard for people to grasp?

  • afguy

    al Qaeda and the MIC… a “marriage” made somewhere other than “heaven”…

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Think of the shock this is going to cause.

    Twenty to ninety years ago, we had communists.

    Before that, there were anarchists.

    For eleven years we have had Al Qada.

    With no enemies, it looks like we will have no choice but to work on solving our domestic problems.

    Somewhere GOP strategists are crying.

  • sacredh

    Is it OK to tip them if they do a really good job of groping? I’ve had lap dances that weren’t as satisfying.

  • pintortwo

    It has been years since the United States has had good intelligence on the whereabouts of Al Qaeda leader Osama bin laden… CIA director Leon Panetta said on Sunday.

    Not since “the early 2000s” have U.S. officials had “the last precise information about where he (bin Laden) might be located,”

    .
    - link
    .
    .
    Al Qaeda’s likely been dead for about a decade.

  • http://edismeiamhe edismeiamhe

    Ah, if it were only true, that radical Islam could be disgarded by the Islamic hordes so easily.

blog comments powered by Disqus