McChrystal Ball-Gazing

Reading the assessment of the challenges facing the U.S. and its allies in Afghanistan just penned by Stan McChrystal – the Army general and Afghan commander fired by President Obama last June for speaking out of school to a reporter for Rolling Stone – makes you realize just how keenly he views the foe:

While a deeply flawed insurgent force in many ways, the Taliban is a uniquely 21st-century threat. Enjoying the traditional insurgent advantage of living amid a population closely tied to them by history and culture, they also leverage sophisticated technology that connects remote valleys and severe mountains instantaneously — and allows them to project their message worldwide, unhindered by time or filters. They are both deeply embedded in Afghanistan’s complex society and impressively agile. And just like their allies in al Qaeda, this new Taliban is more network than army, more a community of interest than a corporate structure.

For the U.S. military that I spent my life in, this was not an easy insight to come by. It was only over the course of years, and with considerable frustrations, that we came to understand how the emerging networks of Islamist insurgents and terrorists are fundamentally different from any enemy the United States has previously known or faced.

In the latest issue of Foreign Policy, McChrystal eyeballs the Taliban and details how he thinks they can be defeated.

Related Topics: mcchrystal, taliban, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • afguy

    Well, for one thing we need to STOP supporting various factions simply because they are also the “enemy of my enemy”.
    .
    For some reason, we seem to end up having to fight these former “friends” because the political winds change.
    .
    Marcy Wheeler posted a piece today titled “WikiLeaks Cables: US Foreign Policy Indistinguishable from Business Interests”. Worth a read and it explains the root of a LOT of our problems.
    .
    http://firedoglake.com/

  • afguy

    Maybe we need a little more of a moral compass in our policies and a little less of a “ledger sheet bottom-line” mentality.

  • michaelfury

    “US Foreign Policy Indistinguishable from Business Interests”

    Same as it ever was:

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/right-of-way/

  • kbanginmotown

    “Ball Gazing”
    .
    Where’s AMC when you need her…?

  • ifthethunderdontgetya

    It was only over the course of years, and with considerable frustrations, that we came to understand how the emerging networks of Islamist insurgents and terrorists are fundamentally different from any enemy the United States has previously known or faced.
    ==================

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. And if our fundamentally different enemy all went “suicide squad, we’d have new fundamentally different enemies overnight. To take money from the proles and funnel it into the pockets of the plutocrats.
    ~

  • formerlyjames

    Such nonsense. How to defeat the enemy. Now he tells us. Gotta make a living. How we have been defeating ourselves would be more appropriate, but he has no clue, nor does our State Dept.

  • Cookie Puss

    Un-winnable. Next.

  • apr2563

    Watch the documentary Restrepo. You will learn how our service people are having to fight in an impossible war. The 15 months that the company had to endure and how the soldiers find their main goal is to keep each other alive.

  • gysgt213

    Wonder if this also included Joe?
    .
    The list of targeted visitors was long, according to interviews with members of the IO team and internal documents obtained by Rolling Stone. Those singled out in the campaign included senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin; Rep. Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee; Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts.
    .
    The incident offers an indication of just how desperate the U.S. command in Afghanistan is to spin American civilian leaders into supporting an increasingly unpopular war. According to the Defense Department’s own definition, psy-ops – the use of propaganda and psychological tactics to influence emotions and behaviors – are supposed to be used exclusively on “hostile foreign groups.” Federal law forbids the military from practicing psy-ops on Americans, and each defense authorization bill comes with a “propaganda rider” that also prohibits such manipulation. “Everyone in the psy-ops, intel, and IO community knows you’re not supposed to target Americans,” says a veteran member of another psy-ops team who has run operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. “It’s what you learn on day one.”
    .

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/another-runaway-general-army-deploys-psy-ops-on-u-s-senators-20110223

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    Marcy permalink:
    .
    http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/02/23/a-tale-of-three-wikileak-stories/
    .
    One of the themes of the cables, to Marcy, was the way they illustrated the contempt with which democracy is held by those writing and presumably reading those cables:
    .

    .
    I’m talking to John Campbell, former Ambassador to Nigeria, and now at the CFR tonight. I am gonna raise the questions Marcy has been posing.
    .

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    I had much of the same reaction. The quote describes an “enemy” that comprises the population.
    .
    And, jeez, it took him this long to get the conceptual framework here? I thought this was standard War College stuff, post Vietnam, and certainly post-Petraeus’ anti insurgency work.

  • nflfoghorn

    So Stuart is actually a Sim? ;)

  • afguy

    Talk to anone who was sent to Vietnam as a “ground pounder”.
    .
    They had the same concern – staying alive long enough to make it back home.

  • afguy

    But, then, there’s what’s “illegal” but really isn’t until someone knocks on your door and says “You’re under arrest for…”.
    .
    I’m afraid THAT’s our current definition of “illegal” – something you actually have to serve time for doing.
    .
    Anything that gets you less than actual punishment is on the table.

blog comments powered by Disqus