Pirates Kill 4 Americans, U.S. Navy Says

The USS Sterett
The Quest

The fate of the four Americans held by pirates on their yacht off Somalia ended in tragedy today as all four perished at the hands of their captors, Navy officials say. “This did not end the way we wanted it to,” says a Navy official. “After we’d be talking to the pirates for four days we were hoping for a better ending.”

Vice Adm. Mark Fox will soon brief from Bahrain on the case, but early word is that the pirates may have been spooked by the close approach of a U.S. warship shortly after dawn Wednesday. The USS Sterett came within “several hundred” yards of the yacht Quest, which was owned by Jean and Scott Adam and also carrying friends Phyllis Macay and Bob Riggle. A Navy official, speaking privately, suggested the Sterett had to get closer to the Quest as the radio batteries on the Quest began running out. There was no explanation as to why this approach should have alarmed the pirates aboard the Quest if they had been told in advance that the warship was going to come closer to maintain their radio link.

As the 500-foot destroyer drew closer to the 58-foot yacht, “they heard shots and an RPG was fired at the Sterett” from the yacht, a Navy official says. By the time sailors boarded the yacht, the four Americans had been mortally wounded, as had two pirates, apparently by their fellow pirates. “Those two may have wanted to surrender — we just don’t know yet,” he says.

Fox later told reporters that the Navy vessels involved in shadowing the Quest in recent days, in additional to the Sterett, were the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf and the guided-missile destroyer USS Bulkeley. Two pirates from the Quest had boarded the Sterett Monday as negotiations intensified, Fox said.

After a flurry of gunfire was heard from the Quest, “several pirates appeared on the deck of the Quest and moved up to the bow with their hands in the air in surrender,” Fox said. U.S. commandos then boarded the yacht from their small launches, and killed two pirates as they cleared the vessel — one with a pistol and the second in a knife fight. “The loss of our fellow Americans,” Fox said from Bahrain, “is a tragedy.”

Fox, the Navy chief for U.S. Central Command, discussed the challenge of dealing with pirates just last month. “Up until this point we have been taking what I would refer to as the Western mindset of dealing with hijackers or pre-9/11 the way we dealt with a hijacker was hey, let’s make sure everybody’s okay. A great deal of focus, and appropriately so, on the safety of the crew and of the hostages,” he said over breakfast Jan. 27. “That’s been our approach because we’ve been very concerned. It’s very difficult to ensure the safety of the hostages when you have a pirate situation.”

After the 2009 rescue of hostage Richard Phillips of the Maersk Alabama held by Somali pirates — all three were killed by a volley of shots fired by Navy SEAL snipers — Wednesday’s deaths are a harsh reminder of how quickly things can head south. A total of 15 of the pirates are now in custody aboard the Enterprise. “There is going to be an investigation into what happened,” the Navy official says. “There will be a lot of second-guessing.”

Related Topics: navy, pirates, quest, sterett, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • nflfoghorn

    Sad. We should never pay these desperate yet wrong-headed people a dime. And people who want to sail exotic locations ought to avoid the Gulf of Aden.

  • 53_3

    I think that we have a good enough reason now to go in there and dig these guys out.
    .
    And leave afterward, with a very tough message that we’ll be back if need be..

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    The unfortunate truth is as a huge portion of global naval traffic passing through the Somali area increases as a result of globalization, the casualties as a result of piracy will only continue to rise. While the United States as the global superpower has appointed itself as the police officer of all the world’s oceans, solving the extreme crisis in Somalia requires that the international community supports creating a stable government and economy in that area.

  • nflfoghorn

    And that costs something we all don’t have much of: $.

  • afguy

    And also something else we are short on in that part of the world: credibility.

  • square1

    There was no explanation as to why this approach should have alarmed the pirates aboard the Quest if they had been told in advance that the warship was going to come closer to maintain their radio link.

    For better or worse, Navy Seals have a reputation for shooting Somali pirates in the head. If I was a Somali pirate I might become agitated when approached by a U.S. destroyer attempting to “communicate”.

  • afguy

    I thought about this:
    .
    Talks drag on for days, then a warship shows up.
    .
    The pirates MAY have thought they had been “had” by some negotiational “foot-dragging”… NOT “good-faith” talks.
    .
    They took it out on the hostages and other fellow pirates who felt like continuing the “negotiations”.

  • robbert5

    It is not solely the US that is policing the waters there. Europe as well as Australia as well as Asian countries have sent warships over and sometimes successfully averted hijackings. But like everything else, progress in this case in Somalia, depends on a global effort but also a regional effort to create stability. The US should not be the frontrunner in this one, it is foremost an African problem who could use the help of world not just US to solve the issues.

  • paulejb

    Time to take the gloves off. Hang a few from the yardarm to get the point across that piracy is a dangerous occupation.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    We can barely to establish a stable government and economy in the US let alone anywhere else.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    It sounds like the RWers are arguing for war. That is the last thing this country can afford right now. What happened to “personal responsibility”? If people want to sail in waters known for piracy then it is their own fault when something happens to them. Or is the dogma now, do something stupid and you can expect the government to bail you out so long at requires guns and bombs?

  • libssd

    Given the relative ignorance of Americans of anything that happens outside our borders, most people are unaware that piracy in this area has risen dramatically since the Maersk incident. It’s a huge area to cover, and the pirates are venturing farther and farther from Somalia.

    http://www.icc-ccs.org/news/429-hostage-taking-at-sea-rises-to-record-levels-says-imb

    Commercial shipping must travel through this area; tourists don’t. While the most recent loss of life is regrettable, if you put yourself in harm’s way, don’t be surprised when harm shows up.

  • afguy

    Unless we are prepared to institute and support a permanent, close-by escort service for shipping in that area, AND are able to take decision action in ALL cases, we aren’t going to stop this.
    .
    If anything, the pirates will learn to “shoot and scoot” and not stick around long enough to justify any “negotiations” between them and an armed warship.
    .
    I really doubt that publicly executing a few of them will serve as a deterrent. Living itself in that part of the world is dangerous enough. At least the piracy itself offers a chance for some profit.
    .
    Piracy will stop when there is a stable government to police it and the participants have viable economic altenatives to the practice.
    .
    They aren’t living or thinking like we do about their day-to-day existence.

  • square1

    I think you have it exactly backwards.
    .
    Somalian “piracy” is simply a business operation and the vast majority of the time nobody gets hurt.
    .
    The people that most of us call pirates are viewed by Somalians as basically members of a rogue, militia coast guard patrolling the territorial waters of their nation and collecting duties or taxes on those using their coastal waters. If you want to use their waters, pay the piper. Again, the vast majority of the time “paying the piper” is no more dangerous than filing your taxes with the IRS.
    .
    Now, to be clear, many of the actions of the Somalian pirates would be illegal under international law even if conducted by an official coast guard. But that hardly strikes me as justification for escalating a U.S. presence in the region and “Hang[ing] a few from the yardarm.”
    .
    It strikes me as far cheaper and more realistic to simply tell Americans yachting abroad to make sure that they take out piracy insurance and understand that sailing around the world is a “dangerous occupation.”
    .
    My guess is that if the pirates had been dealing with a trained negotiator hired by an insurance company, instead of a U.S. destroyer, everyone would be alive today.

  • abdullah69

    Meanwhile the GOP works to create a new Mogadishu in Washington……

  • troubador222

    Its a tragedy and not to take away from that, but yeah I wonder too why someone would sail their yacht into an area known for piracy. Its like that could on the Mexican border, jet skiing on a lake known for drug smuggling. I mean it’s a big world and there are plenty of beautiful places to vacation in where pirates and drug smuggling rings are not operating.

  • troubador222

    Insert couple jet skiing, not could jet skiing. Spell checker strikes again, LOL

  • http://oldmachead.wordpress.com oldmachead

    Just one question:

    Why do the Somali pirates (or coastguard or whatever you choose to call them – I think ‘pirate’ is an accurate description) steer clear of any Russian flagged vessels?

  • afguy

    square1,
    .
    I think I recall that exact point made some time in the past. That’s how they act – like a business – albeit not like one we think of, mind you, but a business, nevertheless.
    .
    One with risks and rewards.
    .
    The Cosa Nostra thought of themselves as businessmen too. We called them mobsters, but that’s not how they thought of themselves.

  • paulejb

    square1@5.1,
    .
    I’ll bet that Edward Teach aka Blackbeard tried that same excuse. It didn’t work.

  • afguy

    I guess it’s not as important what WE think they are as what they think they are themselves.
    .
    Should we think of and deal with them as an organized crime syndicate, maybe?

  • paulejb

    erieangel@6,
    .
    Not so much a war. More like pest extermination.

  • lou58lou

    Time to leave Afghanistan, and invade Somalia to get rid of all the pirates.

  • apr2563

    paulejb that little invasion into Somalia during the Bush Sr. regime. An invasion with no plan for leaving. Then Clinton became President and blackhawk down happened. We left. Now you want to go back? Or do you want to do a McCain bomb, bomb, bomb solution?

  • apr2563

    I am very sad for the murdered people and their families. From what I read, they were very savvy and knew the risk. When people take the risk of venturing into hazardess areas, they must be prepared. I feel the same about people who climb mountains during avalanche season, who go diving solo, and those who chose to hike and then wander over dangerous borders.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Bomb the bastards out of the water. And if they don’t stop, bomb em some more.
    .
    Liberals are such f@cking pacifist cowards!
    .
    Bring it on!

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    “I am very sad for the murdered people and their families.”
    .
    Oh sure you are.

  • square1

    I love these classic comments from the Republicans. Real “small government” types. They really want to “cut spending”. They really want to limit government power to what is expressly enumerated in the Constitution.

    Except for this…

    Fox later told reporters that the Navy vessels involved in shadowing the Quest in recent days, in additional to the Sterett, were the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf and the guided-missile destroyer USS Bulkeley.

    Republicans have no problem sending roughly, oh, $30-50 Billion worth of navy ships on a mission to track 4 Americans on a private yacht that is half-way around the globe. The mind boggles at the probable cost of this mission. Aside from the thousands of naval personnel on the ships involved, one suspects that the White House likely approved the dispatch of another SEAL team, from parts unknown, since the last mission was both a tactical and p.r. success.

  • afguy

    Bomb WHO, 2/3?
    .
    Those guys in the boat with the “skull and crossbones” on their flag, patch over their eyes, and the cutlass in their teeth? Those pirates?
    .
    Let’s see… bombing implies aircraft. Aircraft implies carrier or land base. We got any bases around Somalia?
    .
    You want to station a carrier there to protect shipping against occasional forays by a bunch of guys in motorized skiffs? Or, maybe, just invade Somalia (again) and build a base there.
    .
    ‘Wingers are such enthusiastic warfare freaks… willing to fight to the last drop of blood… someone else’s, that is… and kill as many of “them” as we can… who “them” are, they aren’t sure.
    .
    But they’ll know then when they see them.

  • chabwoy

    I regret the tragic loss of the Americans’ lives, and offer condolences to the victims’ families.

    That said, political spin on what transpired during the botched rescue and the true version of events are sometimes contradictory, especially when law-enforcement or the military are involved.

    Sometimes, as in the Maersk rescue, the outcome is favorable, and the government is quick to tout its
    resourses and stealth.

    Other times, as in the Tilman affair, it is entirely possible that the true version of events would cause
    an unacceptable PR fall-out, and a more noble spin is opted for by the politico-military establishment.

    Why would the pirates, so close to receiving their pay-day ransom, shoot the hostages, thus gauranteeing their own demise, or life-long incarceration?

    Is it possible that the Navy stormed the boat, guns ablaze, and colateral loss of life was deemed a somehow acceptable outcome?

    I’m just sayin’…

  • liberalmeltdown

    We should pay them millions and give them homes in Nantucket.
    .
    Send them apology letters. Free tickets to Disneyland for life.
    .
    And instate tuition to our universities. Any other goodies you can think of to give away? A phony SS card with Obama’s name on it. Oh I know, a green car built by GM: a Volt, complete with extension chord.
    .
    Invite them to speak at Columbia. They can debate this guy:

  • liberalmeltdown

    Well if you get kidnapped we will send someone on a rowboat from Long Beach. Please be patient. Mr. save a buck.
    .
    The NUMBER ONE ROLE of government is to protect its citizens.
    .
    That has morphed into: Please Mr government help me, help me. I can’t anything without you. Be there for me from the time that my mother decides not to abort me until the health care panel decides it is time for me to die. PLEASE!

blog comments powered by Disqus