Do You Feel $1 Billion Safer Today?

Pentagon contracts have become increasingly fuzzy in recent years, with descriptions of just what it is we’re getting for our money tough to discern. The latest example was at the top of the list of contracts announced by the Pentagon late Tuesday. It’s paying four companies as much as $281.7 million each (where do they come up with these precise numbers, especially when spread across four firms?) for an “indefinite-delivery/indefinite quantity contract to provide advisory and assistance services” to the U.S. military’s Missile Defense Agency. That fuzzy enough for you? If you need more “clarity” — check this out.

The four lucky winners — Booz Allen Hamilton of McLean, Va.; MacAulay-Brown, Inc. of Dayton, Ohio; Science Applications International Corp. of Arlington, Va.; and TASC of Andover, Mass. — “will assist the acquisition directorate in providing agency advisory analytical support for subject matter expertise throughout the agency for engineering, test, finance, acquisition, readiness and strategic activities in support of the Ballistic Missile Defense System.” A quick review of contracting data shows such deals to be annual events, even though this one runs through 2016.

So we’re spending more than $1 billion for ill-defined contracts against ill-defined threats as our nation drowns in debt? Hey — been there, done that. As a young kid in the 1950s, I heard about the (non-existent) missile and bomber gaps that threatened the U.S. After my church burned down in the 1960s, I attended Mass for awhile in a building at an abandoned Nike missile site that had been built to protect me from attacking Soviet bombers. In the 1990s, I toured the junked Safeguard anti-missile system in Nekoma, N.D., the nation’s only operational missile-killer prior to the system now in place in Alaska and California. That system cost us about $25 billion and “defended” us, or at least a handful of our nuclear missiles, for about six months in 1975-76. Such defenses are the ultimate military-industrial complex con job — so long as we’re not attacked, we can declare that they’re working.

Related Topics: missile defense, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • jeriv

    I can’t believe Republicans/Tea Partiers are all so gung-ho about deficit reduction, but NO ONE talks about reducing and reforming Defense spending.
    .
    I just can’t take them seriously when they go nuts about 100 million in subsidies to prevent folks from freezing to death in Winter, but don’t lift a finger from stopping 1.5 TRILLION, billions of which are in “subsidies” to build weapons we no longer need, use, or are as of today obsolete.

  • fasteddie9318

    Of course I don’t feel safer today; earlier you reported that Kim Il Sung had not only risen from the dead, but managed to shave about 30 years off his age. If that’s the level of technology North Korea has achieved, I’m terrified.

  • michaelfury

    “Science Applications International Corp. of Arlington, Va”

    ————————————

    “Science Applications International (SAIC) is the DOD and Homeland Security contractor that supplied the largest contingent of non-governmental investigators
    to the NIST WTC investigation. SAIC has extensive links to nano-thermites, developing and judging nano-thermite research proposals for the military and
    other military contractors, and developing and formulating nano-thermites directly (Army 2008, DOD 2007). SAIC’s subsidiary Applied Ordnance Technology has done research on the ignition of nanothermites with lasers (Howard et al 2005).”

    - Kevin Ryan, “The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites”, 2008

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/the-rest-is-silence/

  • freeinpa

    Obama was president for 2 years and the Dems controlled congress for how many years an dits the Republicans fault the Dems increased defense spending over the past 2 years?
    .
    Now you want to castigate Repubs fo rending the budget madness when the deficit more than doubled under Obama.

  • acameronw

    Come on now, jeriv. You know that the Tea Party can’t be bothered to venture too far into the weeds of the defense budget. Eliminating NPR and PBS, that’s where the real savings are.

  • freeinpa

    “weeds of the defense budget. Eliminating NPR and PBS, that’s where the real savings are.”
    .
    I can find providing for defense in he constitution but can you point me to where the taxpayer is to provide employment to Big Bird and Elmo?

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Mark, good hint at things to come. I’ll look forward to more details leaked at fuzzy / wasteful MIC projects. We’re fortunate that some media types are focusing on Boehner’s F-35 spare engine. What a coincidence that a GE plant between his home town and Cincinnati happens to build it. I hope you find even better head-scratching, why-are-we-paying-for-this projects and post ‘em here.

  • pintortwo

    Thank you Mr Thompson. I’m quick to point out when newsies don’t plainly give their interpretation of how things are but rather dispense homogenized pulp. This is a commendable post…
    .
    Such defenses are the ultimate military-industrial complex con job — so long as we’re not attacked, we can declare that they’re working.
    .
    ..when most of your peers and institutions seem invested in the con.

  • hippooath

    The constitution provides for defense true, but there’s nothing in there about offense.

  • freeinpa

    The best defense is a good offense

  • liberalmeltdown

    If there is and I am sure that there is, wasteful spending, then it should be cut.
    .
    If you think that 1 billion is something to get upset about for the Federal Government, how about 15 billion for a broke and bankrupt state like California.
    .
    The pensions of public employees is out of control. There are now 5,000 TEACHERS making over $100,000 per year on a pension. If they were to live for 30 years, that’s 15 Billion for just 5,000 government employees. How many government employees do we have?
    .
    2.15 Million. The pension number for that many fat pensions will send us to bankruptcy.
    .
    Let’s say that on average they collect a pension of $75,000 a year. That’s 2.15 million times 75,000 = 161 billion a year. That’s 3.22 trillion for twenty years, and that’s just the pension, not including their health care.
    .
    Do you feel 3.22 trillion better about employing Federal workers?

  • pintortwo

    I can find providing for defense in he constitution but can you point me to where the taxpayer is to provide employment to Big Bird and Elmo?
    .
    Good point.
    .
    Some argue that the fed shouldn’t tax labor and should stay out of that arrangement entirely. I’d say that the govt has the ability to hire and create, maintain jobs. That ability to create employment is a legitimate option, to me, should the govt decide to stimulate the economy. I’d rather it used sparingly -we all have our own tolerance level- but am fine with having federal employees and fed-sponsored hiring in response to an employment crisis.
    .
    I’m also put-off when some of us argue job provision to legitimize the defense budget, especially domestic manufacturing. I find it dishonest to claim deference to a state-side production complex, and its employees, when that person would readily argue to defund my state the ability to fix our roads. I like that my local govt hires people to remove the snow, these guys are my neighbors- I wouldn’t mind if the fed gave us some money to get rid of all of it and repair the pot-holes…
    .
    Or get some poor soldiers from the Army Corps of Engineers off these spectacularly funded projects to build spare-no-expense, cutting-edge edifices in overseas wastelands, and share some of that tech and methods with local cos and show them how to better fix a bridge or build a new one. And yes, hire them to do it.

  • afguy

    EXACTLY WHICH orifice did you just pull those numbers from?
    .
    Got reputable links to anything even remotely supporting your ramblings there, slick?
    .
    And please don’t pull out another Fox or RedState-generated chart… remember, I did specify “reputable”…

  • freeinpa

    “I’d say that the govt has the ability to hire and create, maintain jobs.”
    .
    I agree in large part except the ability to maintain jobs is short term at best unless you are counting the permanent government infrastructure of public employees themselves. If the government spends taxpayer money (let’s avoid the word stimulus) to repair roads in Cleveland. It is short term at least to those people in Cleveland. When the repairs are finished so are those jobs.
    .
    I also don’t believe that domestic manufacturing is a good argument for defense spending. Do we spend too much on defense? Yes and every other department in the government as well.
    .
    “I like that my local govt hires people to remove the snow, these guys are my neighbors- I wouldn’t mind if the fed gave us some money to get rid of all of it and repair the pot-holes…”
    .
    And ther eis nothing wrong with local governments hiring folks for snow removal or trash pick up or any other number of tasks. What we have gotten away from is that these jobs usually go to the lowest common denominator of talent that are unaccountable, impossible to fire and reside in a world of financial fantasy.
    .
    There is also nothing wrong with feds paying for pot hole repair. Again we have gotten away from a realty where the federal gas tax that is collected it used to dredge the channels for boats or renovating train depots instead of roads.

    Once you get away from fiscal discipline money is just spent and federal state local governments and many citizens look at the pay and dollars as an entitlement that can be fed by taxes for somewhere else. I believe it was Carter that begun the practice of baseline budgeting whereby every year starts with more money, never less to the budget. Paygo is a joke to both parties as they yell “emergency”.
    .
    We need t go back to common sense and accountability whereby the government is the “bank” of last resort and not the ATM for every wish, whim and perceived problem.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Oh, I forgot we have to start with 2+2=4.
    .
    http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/2011/02/11/number-of-100000-retirees-skyrocket-in-teacher-pension-system/75286/
    .
    On its website, the foundation publishes searchable databases of retirees earning $100,000 or more from a couple of state pension systems, including CalSTRS, the pension system for retired California teachers.

    The foundation initially obtained the data for its “CalSTRS $100,000 pension club” database in May 2009. Back then there were 3,010 retirees earning $100,000 or more annually from CalSTRS. Earlier this month, the foundation obtained updated data from CalSTRS and the number has grown to 5,308 (5,309 if you count one woman earning $99,998.88).

    That’s a 76 percent increase. In less than two years.

    And that’s not all. The foundation, run by President Marcia Fritz, also requested a list of CalSTRS retirees earning $75,000 or more annually. Guess how many CalSTRS pensioners are earning between $75,000 and $99,999.99.

    19,503.

    Combined you’re looking at 24,811 retired California teachers earning more than $75,000. That’s more than the entire population of Seal Beach.
    .
    .
    Here’s a couple of sources for the number of Federal Workers. Have you heard of a thing called a search engine? Many people use Google. You should try it, slick.
    .
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/02/burgeoning-federal-payroll-signals-return-of-big-g/
    .
    The government’s census numbers say that there are 2.5 million full time federal workers.
    http://www2.census.gov/govs/apes/09fedfun.pdf
    .
    Here’s some more info for you slick. The $41,000 + in benefits for the average Fed worker includes health care and pension, slick.

    http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/income/2010-08-10-1Afedpay10_ST_N.htm

    At a time when workers’ pay and benefits have stagnated, federal employees’ average compensation has grown to more than double what private sector workers earn, a USA TODAY analysis finds.

    Federal workers have been awarded bigger average pay and benefit increases than private employees for nine years in a row. The compensation gap between federal and private workers has doubled in the past decade.

    Federal civil servants earned average pay and benefits of $123,049 in 2009 while private workers made $61,051 in total compensation, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The data are the latest available.

    The federal compensation advantage has grown from $30,415 in 2000 to $61,998 last year.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Are we good, slick?

blog comments powered by Disqus