Winning Votes for New START, $1 Billion At a Time

We’ve written before on the U.S. military’s quest to be able to attack targets anywhere in the world even more quickly than we currently can. Why take hours to destroy a “fleeting” — that’s the word that’s usually used — nuclear-related or terror target when time is of the essence? This has been a big issue among some hawks, although they rarely note we inevitably lack the necessary intelligence to make such wonder weapons worthwhile.

But such birds of prey need not worry. The Obama Administration has just detailed to skeptical senators that the pending nuclear-arms pact with Russia won’t hinder the development of such speedy arms:

The New START Treaty allows the United States to deploy CPGS [conventional prompt global strike] systems, and does not in any way limit or constrain research, development, testing, and evaluation of such concepts and systems, which offer the prospect of striking any target in the world in less than an hour.

In fact, the Pentagon plans on spending “well over” $1 billion on such weapons in the next five years. Maybe by the time they get them into the arsenal our intel capabilities will have improved enough to make the investment worthwhile. And maybe they’ll be capable of shooting down flying pigs, as well.

Related Topics: arms control, New START, prompt global strike, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • 11charlie

    Why stop at CPGS? The hawks should hold out until they’re promised that infantryman will have plasma guns and grav belts by this time next year.

  • sasquatch08

    Dude, I just picked up a plasma rifle and the gun show last week… Thing is SWEET, cept for the large hole I melted in the side of my house.
    .
    Seriously though, they should pass this treaty. I guess it doesn’t really have to be done this year, but it would be nice if it got done at some point in the not-to-distant future. Unfortunately there are some retards out there who believe Red Russia is coming back…

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    So, the pentagon has a plan to transfer $1 billion of the US treasury into the hands of private contractors. Is it really the pentagon who is pushing for these new weapons or was it more like a scenerio whereby the defense contractors went to the military and asked to be paid to build these new, totally unnecessary weapons?
    .
    As for the treaty. I wish the media would stop with all the “its passage will be a win for Obama”. This treaty’s passage will be a win for the United States of America. And what is a win for one (president/country) is not always a win for the other.

blog comments powered by Disqus