Mental Ills Biggest Reason New Troops Booted Out

In an August story on the Army’s overwhelmed mental-health corps, we noted:

One anonymous mental-health professional told researchers last year that he spends a quarter of his time on “really sick people who never should have been let in [the military] to begin with.”

The Pentagon has just formally acknowledged his off-handed assessment:

Psychiatric discharges were the most common cause of EPTS [Existing Prior To Service] discharges in the Army, Navy, and Marines, accounting for (24.2%), (17.8%), and (43.6%) of EPTS discharges, respectively.

Such discharges played a major role in the Army’s attrition rate: one in five soldiers doesn’t complete his or her first two years of service.

Such discharges — administrative, as opposed to the standard honorable — take place only when the condition rendering someone unfit for military service can be shown to have existed before the recruit began service, and surfaced within the first six months in uniform.

“The great majority of EPTS discharges are for medical conditions that were not discovered or disclosed at the time of application for service,” the report says, “with concealment by the applicant being the most common scenario.” Surprise: it’s easier to hide stuff from an eager recruiter, trying to make his monthly goal, than from a drill sergeant trying to make a military.

Related Topics: mental health, recruits, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • grape_crush

    “…with concealment by the applicant being the most common scenario.”

    Wow. I wonder where an 18-year-old with mental issues (or other challenges to getting accepted into military service) goes to learn how to fool a trained military recruiter?

    Surprise: it’s easier to hide stuff from an eager recruiter, trying to make his monthly goal, than from a drill sergeant trying to make a military.

    Suprise: it’s easier for a recruiter, eager to make his monthly goal, to falsify/ignore/work around an applicant’s issues than to locate and convince prime applicants to join the military.

    It’s not as if any of this is new, is it? From 2005:

    Interviews with more than two dozen recruiters in 10 states hint at the extent of their concern, if not the exact scope of the transgressions. Several spoke of concealing mental-health histories and police records. They described falsified documents, wallet-size cheat sheets slipped to applicants before the military’s aptitude test and commanding officers who look the other way. And they voiced doubts about the quality of some troops destined for the front lines.

    The recruiters insisted on anonymity to avoid being disciplined, but their accounts were consistent, and the specifics were verified in several cases by documents and interviews with military officials and applicants’ families.[...]

    Recruiters and some senior Army officials, however, said that for every impropriety that is found, at least two more are never discovered. And the Army’s figures show that it is not punishing serious offenses as it once did…

  • formerlyjames

    A further question relates to the nature of those who enter the military now. To be more specific, is the military bending toward the right wing with all of the ideological and theological baggage that goes with that demographic? I think probably so. The military isn’t your father’s or you grandfather’s military any more, that is, a cross section of the entire citizenry.
    .
    A broad based military is essential to our country and the participation and sacrifice of all citizens are essential to our security. I know it’s not a popular concept, although it served us well throughout most of our history, but universal service and conscription are the only way to serve those ends.
    .
    Back to the present post, I see no reason for alarm. In fact, it is a good thing that the deficient inductees are discovered after entry, although cost savings would be realized by earlier identification. The pressure on recruiters to meet possibly unrealistic goals is obviously one contributory factor. When the draft filled the needs of the Viet Nam war, the same pressure fell to local draft boards and the same situation resulted. During that time the Army experimented with a program to bring mentally and physically deficient inductees up to standard. The Navy and Marines had year long waiting lists to even join, and the Marines were, well, just the Marines, but draftees were randomly assigned to them.

  • formerlyjames

    Correction: the Navy and AF (not Marines) had year long waiting lists. Further, forget about the NG or Reserve, unless you had influence (a la GW Bush).

  • afguy

    formerly,
    .
    Been trying to make just that point for a while now. The AF and Navy had one-stripers who could have been Army and Marine oficers but did NOT want to be ground targets and were willing to endure the extra commitment for the added safety and security.

  • afguy

    and the Marines were, well, just the Marines, but draftees were randomly assigned to them.
    .
    This was the routine at the processsing depot: All present who did NOT enlist in a branch of service count off by threes.
    .
    Everyone who was a “3″ step forward – you are now in the Marines. The rest of you are Army.
    .
    Don’t recall if they administered the oath BEFORE or AFTER they put you in the branch of service.

  • formerlyjames

    afguy, I was one of those Army 6 month wonders. Actually the Marines didn’t change or relax commissioning standards as much as the Army because they didn’t have to. Next to the Army, the Marines, contrary to common belief, are not really significant as war goes. They are relative to the Army small in size. I mentioned that once to a group of gung-ho high school kids who were going to join the Marines and they wanted to lynch me.

  • formerlyjames

    But those 6 months were no picnic. About 50% of those who started with me finished with me. Also, my gunnery officer was a Marine since they attended the same artillery school.

blog comments powered by Disqus