"Follow The Money"

That Hollywood advice to young reporters brought down a President, and now it’s going to keep China out of a second Korean war. In the just-published winter issue of the Air Force’s Strategic Studies Quarterly, a U.S. intelligence analyst specializing in northeast Asia and nuclear matters predicts that China’s reliance on world trade will keep it on the sidelines if war erupts anew on the Korean peninsula. Japanese-based U.S. Air Force Capt. Jacquelyn Schneider writes:

Perhaps the greatest argument against Chinese military involvement in a second Korean War is its position and reliance on the global economy. As one of the world’s leading exporters, China’s fortunes are irrevocably inter­twined with states poised against North Korea. According to PRC Ministry of Commerce data from February 2010, China in 2009 completed almost $32 billion in trade with the United States, $16.6 billion with South Korea, and $25.5 billion with Japan. In total, China’s trade with the United States, Japan, and South Korea totaled roughly $74 billion and comprised a full 30 percent of China’s total trade. In comparison, China claimed the paltry sum of $380 million in legitimate trade with North Korea, most of which is comprised of highly subsidized loans and aid. To add to the economic repercussions, China is the largest single holder of US cur­rency. The devaluation of the dollar due to a drawn-out war on the pen­insula would deplete the value of China’s stockpiles and perversely damage the Chinese perhaps more acutely than the United States

Peace through Walmart?

Related Topics: China, korea, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • michaelfury
  • sacredh

    If China stays out of a US-North Korea conflict, I wonder if the US would do the same if China used the opportunity to make a move on Taiwan? It’s possible that China could conclude that US wouldn’t be able to handle 4 conflicts at the same time.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Interesting, considering the agressive downsizing that’s currently taking place in our military.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    I really don’t think the situations are comparable, sacredh. Taiwan is actually a positive to the US, quite unlike North Korea to China. (Also, 2thirdsrocks, there’s no downsizing going on. One recent article: “President Barack Obama asked Congress to approve a record $708 billion in defense spending for fiscal 2011, but vowed to continue his drive to eliminate unnecessary, wasteful weapons programs. The budget calls for a 3.4 percent increase in the Pentagon’s base budget to $549 billion, plus $159 billion to fund U.S. military missions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.” The US spends more than the rest of the world put together on war spending, see this link.
    -
    As to the larger story, that’s how I’m inclined to view things. China is a business, North Korea is bad for business. I don’t think China wants to get sucked into bad things on the Korean peninsula.
    -
    Ya never know, though, that was the attitude in the run-up to WWI.

  • sacredh

    Elvis, I would hope that you are correct, but China might find it intolerable that we’re conducting a military operation in their back yard if we fight North Korea. I think much depends on if they decide that they would be perceived as weak by not not going tit for tat. Standing by and doing nothing might make enormous economic sense, but losing face in the region could be more than they’re willing to risk.

  • GivenUp

    The irony is that currency devaluation would actually help the US at this point and hurt the Chinese, so in essence it would be a bit of a win-win scenario, either we keep the status quo or we get rid of North Korea, quite possibly helping to save the economy in the process.
    .
    Needless to say I am not advocating war, just noting that if it would happen the price (for the US) would probably be lower than it would be at other times.

  • headybrew

    If any of you happen to find the most recent Popular Mechanics, there’s an interesting article about a hypothetical Chinese attack on Taiwan. I found the conclusions they came to, to be a little disturbing though they do look at more than one possible outcome of such a conflict. And it was written before the recent dustup in Korea which of course changes the dynamic in that region, if only temporarily. Worth a read.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    I repeat elvis, all 4 branches of the military are being down sized.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    “China might find it intolerable that we’re conducting a military operation in their back yard if we fight North Korea. ”
    -
    Yeah, that may well be true. Perhaps I’m being too naive here. Maybe China would even love to see the US bogged down in Korea– the UK’s WWII spending & suffering led to the US taking over the lead afterwards.
    -
    But they really do seem to be more concerned with stability than with expansion. They like making money. A war on their border really doesn’t help on that front. I’m not arguing that “trade = peace forever,” but I do think there’s room for cooperation here. Is North Korea anything more than a parasite to China? Is there a chance for China to just walk away from North Korea altogether?
    -
    “I repeat elvis, all 4 branches of the military are being down sized.”
    -
    I’m sorry, 2thirdsrocks, I thought someone had misinformed you that we were cutting our military, and that you’d appreciate seeing a news article pointing out that we’re actually increasing our funding. As it turns out, though, you actually prefer to believe lies. I’ll leave you to them.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    My BIL made a comment couple of months ago about war being good for the economy. Afghanistan and Iraq haven’t proven to be so, but maybe a third front would do the trick and kick our economy into moving again?
    .
    One thing though, if there is a third front anyplac–North Korea of Pakistan, there really should be a draft. Our soldiers are doing too much and being redeployed far too often. And before anybody accuses me of being for a draft because I’m too old to be eligible–I have 2 kids and 1 SIL, a brother and a neice all of whom would be eligible for the draft.

  • yourguidetochina

    Couldn’t agree more. There is almost no chance that China will want to go to war with South Korea, Japan, or the US. To paraphrase Thomas Friedman, it is the McDonald’s theory of world peace.

    Steve
    http://www.TheChinaBusinessGuide.com

blog comments powered by Disqus