North Korea Option: Lowest Common Diplomatic Denominator

Defense Secretary Robert Gates may be a crafty bureaucratic infighter and seasoned national-security pro, but he also knows the limits of his own considerable knowledge: “To any question beginning with ‘Why?’ with regards to North Korea, my answer is the same: `I don’t know.’”

 

South Korean soldiers recreate a battle from the Korean War / DoD photo

While Gates made that remark shortly before North Korea shelled the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong, killing four and wounding at least 15, it sums up the U.S. stance toward the Hermit Kingdom. One day it’s scaring the world with a brand-spanking new nuclear enrichment plant, and the next it’s terrorizing South Koreans by blasting their island from the North Korean mainland, and nobody really knows why.

Just like clockwork, the North’s Korean Central News Agency issued a statement following its artillery barrage blaming the South for the attack.

The south Korean puppet group perpetrated such reckless military provocation as firing dozens of shells inside the territorial waters of the DPRK side around Yonphyong Islet in the West Sea of Korea from 13:00 on Nov. 23 despite the repeated warnings of the DPRK while staging the war maneuvers for a war of aggression on it codenamed Hoguk, escalating the tension on the Korean Peninsula…The revolutionary armed forces of the DPRK standing guard over the inviolable territorial waters of the country took such decisive military step as reacting to the military provocation of the puppet group with a prompt powerful physical strike.

It sounds like a cry for attention from a cold and starving nation that is eager for international fuel and food aid as winter approaches, but hasn’t been taught how to ask nicely. Its bellicosity has worked before, so it’s trying the same stunts again. “We’re not going to buy into this reaction-reward cycle that North Korea seeks to perpetuate,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Tuesday. “We’re not going to respond willy-nilly.” U.S. officials sought to calm things down. “There have been no additional North Korean attacks overnight,” U.S. Army Gen. Walter Sharp, the top U.S. commander in South Korea, told his more than 25,000 U.S. troops Wednesday. “Please continue with your normal activities.

The key U.S. goal is to keep the lid on the Korean peninsula. Seoul reacted to the island attack with threats to retaliate if Pyongyang does it again. But that would jeopardize the 10 million people living in Seoul, within range of North Korean guns, not to mention the 75,000 Americans in and around the South Korean capital. Of course doing nothing can be seen as weakness, or irresolution. Dispatching the carrier USS George Washington and its accompanying armada from Japan to participate in war games with the South Korean navy in the days ahead could be seen as a show of force — or farce, given the ships’ inability to actually change anything in North Korea.

The U.S. is talking to China, North Korea’s godfather, so to speak. “We believe that it’s important that we keep a unified and measured approach going forward,” Toner added. “We’re consulting closely with the Chinese on next steps.” But then he let the cat out of the bag: “It’s going to be a measured and unified response.” That means the only things that will happen are those that all five nations other than North Korea in the so-called six-party talks — South Korea, the U.S., China, Russia and Japan — can agree on, sort of a lowest common diplomatic denominator.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell acknowledged that while more punishing economic sanctions have been put on North Korea since it allegedly sunk the South Korean patrol vessel Cheonan in March, killing 46 sailors, they’ve been tightened about as tight as they can be. “It’s hard to pile more sanctions upon the North than are already there,” he told NBC.

Paul Stares of the Council on Foreign Relations issued a report before the island shelling warning that heightened tensions following the Cheonan’s sinking means a single misstep by either side could lead to war. “Although everyone concerned wants to prevent a major outbreak of hostilities – South Korea fears losing its hard-won prosperity and a much weaker North knows that another war would almost certainly result in its demise – the potential for miscalculation, misunderstanding, and unintended escalation cannot be dismissed, Stares writes.

But John McCreay, a former Defense Intelligence Agency who writes the blog NightWatch, says the North Koreans are not preparing for war:

A review of diplomacy, international relations and leadership activities confirms that North Korea is not preparing for war. Its volleyball team just advanced to the quarterfinals at the Asian Games in Beijing. Senior officials are receiving foreign diplomats as usual. Kim Jong il and his son were reported on 23 November visiting a plant together and Kim visited two others without his son. The number and detail of the activities show that the North does not expect the shelling incident to escalate. There also are no reports of increased civilian or military alerts in North Korea, which would be mandatory precautions if the North expected or intended an escalation.

One of the plants Kim Jong il visited Tuesday was “the newly built Soy Sauce Shop at the Ryongsong Foodstuff Factory,” the KCNA reported in a separate article. “It is a great success that the workers of the factory and soldier-builders have successfully built the modern shop as big as a food processing factory in a short span of time, he noted, expressing great satisfaction over the construction of a model shop,” it continued. “The factory could effect a new turn in the production of essential food as its officials, workers and technicians have dynamically waged a mass technical innovation movement true to the Workers’ Party of Korea idea of pushing back the frontiers of the latest science and technology while planting their feet on their land and looking at the world, he said, adding that this signal turn is a striking demonstration of the validity and vitality of the WPK’s policy on taking hold on science and technology as a lifeline for building an economic power.” Strange words coming from a country where thousands, according to this recent report by Amnesty International, subsist on grass and tree bark.

Related Topics: korea, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • GivenUp

    I would say that dispatching a carrier battle group should do a lot to keep the lid on, the North Koreans are crazy not suicidal, and even one carrier group has enough firepower to turn that country into a parking lot.

  • Alex Vallas

    I wouldn’t bet on it. The North Korean leadership refuses to accept reality. They don’t appear to have any reasoning and fire before thinking. They have been very successful in totally indoctrinating their population — even when masses are starving and they live under brual conditions. The vast majority of North Koreans are absolutely clueless as to what exist beyond their borders. One only has to see how they worship their leader — as seen on limited US TV.
    China needs to reign them in ASAP. The whole world would suffer if we were to enter a nuclear war. God Forbid.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Alex, it won’t be NK that causes or brings us to the brink of a nuclear war. Just look at all the warmongers in this country yelling that we should bomb Iran, NK, Pakistan and any other country that doesn’t agree with the US. The US is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon in wartime and I suspect the memory of that horror is not enough any longer to keep some in this country from advocating for its use again. Even Hillary Clinton had said at one point during the 2008 campaign that Iran should be nuked.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    NK might be a bit hard pressed to drop nukes anyways. It’s not clear they’ve got a functional delivery system

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Four dead and 15 injured! Wow. While not excusing their actions, let’s keep things in perspective Thompson:

    100,000 civilians dead in Iraq, victims of preemptive warfare

    An additional 14,000-34,000 dead civilians in Afghanistant

    Or the dozens of women and children killed in Yemen by U.S. cruise missiles:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/us-cruise-missile-parts-found-in-yemeni-village-where-52-died-1993253.html

  • manuvaram

    Sending the GW could be a terrible move. What if DPRK fires on the aircraft carrier?! Sure, it won’t cause the ship to sink and it could easily retaliate. But are we willing to get involved in a 3rd war. It is unwise to play a game of chicken with irrational dictators.

    And all of this is being done for an ally who won’t even keep its trade commitments to the President.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Ridiculous argument. South Korea’s capital and most of the 30,000 American troops could be shelled at any time by North Korea and unlike the GW, they aren’t moving. The presence of the GW merely presents a show of force implying “we are able to take you on if you so want it” and indicates that all options are on the table. While it is semi-aggressive, it doesn’t change the board.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
    .
    And F-U jackassman!

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    You raise an interesting pt. In the 2nd grade, my mouth was already so foul that the teacher in the adjacent room said my name should be Jack Asser (a pretty close play on my actual nombre). Both my classmates and I thought this was the coolest thing ever.
    .
    Thanks for the memories and may you and yours have a fine Thanksgiving!

  • abdullah69

    The GW is there because the defence industry has decided a stable and static standoff is no longer a viable testing environment for new weapons systems, and the troops need to be evacuated and redeployed to a theatre which presents more opportunities to do some real testing. Over the last ten, fifteen years, the international demand for mines has reduced considerably and the industry has obviously decided it is time to move on to other products in development. I anticipate a move against Sudan, where, like the Balkans, aerial bombing technology can be honed without fear of international repercussions, or alternatively a seaborne invasion of somewhere like Venezuela. The companies spending money for the Marines must have been feeling left out recently. Iran does not present the same opportunities. The battleground is too similar to Iraq or Afghanistan.

  • http://jzpt.wordpress.com jazz648

    Your sarcasm hasn’t gone unnoticed. You may be familiar with American spheres of interest and concern, but you also enjoy standing under the umbrella of world stability that the USA’s soft speech and big stick provide, ABDULLAH69.

  • apr2563

    The US must remember the Korean War and the almost 34,000 Americans that died there. The total deaths were about 2,800,000. Those are guesstimates.
    .
    At the end of the 50s I attended college with a lot of Korean vets taking advantage of the GI Bill. They were older than me and certainly battle weary. Korea was really the forgotton war.
    .
    In 1961 we had a protest at the school. Highly unusual in those days. Gus Hall, the head of the Communist Party had been scheduled to give a speech. The school administration canceled his speech. Korean War vets scheduled a meeting and led a protest. They stated that they fought to preserve freedom of speech. Being the early 60s, we lost. But I had such respect for those vets.
    .
    No More Wars, Please.

  • apr2563

    Found on C&L
    .
    http://newstalgia.crooksandliars.com/gordonskene/newstalgia-reference-room-korea-novemb
    .
    60 years ago this month in Korea. What it looked like. Radio broadcast that informed us things not going so well for UN troops.
    .
    Troops speaking from the Yalu River. They sound so young. Chinese troops had crossed into Korea. President Truman states use of atomic bomb possible.
    .
    So much sounds so familiar.

  • http://jzpt.wordpress.com jazz648

    Communist sympathizer. Pacifism isn’t always the alternative. North Koreans are eating tree bark. The USA, in all of its foibles, has the right sentiment and sentiment in mind: Freedom and liberty. Tune your focus to the “big picture”. While I loathe the fact that American lives have been sacrificed in the past, I, like you, cannot change decisions. Four lives in South Korea were lost because of a a paranoid response to a South Korean military exercise. North Korea was not attacked. Sending a show of power will save South Korean lives.

  • abdullah69

    Interesting how a pacifist, ie. someone who is not prepared to spend taxpayer dollars on redundant weapons systems, becomes a communist. Freedom and liberty are universal concepts, jazzy6. It is not like you can impose them at the point of the gun. Maybe if the US spent as much on soft diplomacy as it did on defence, then freedom and liberty would not be so far out of reach for so many people across the planet. I believe it was Fidel who said “no nation can consider themselves free while another nation lives in chains”. But then again Fidel had the smarts to spend money on healthcare rather than defence. Now Cuba has one of the best healthcare systems in the world, and probably ranks number 1 in the list of “countries most unlikely to be invaded” as well.

  • apr2563

    jazz648: Why don’t you go to Korea, volunteer for their army and see how anxious they are to fight. Of course the N. Koreans suffer, as do millions around the world under dictatorships.
    It is people like you who label anyone who abhors war as a communist that enable the horror of war over diplomacy. There have been justified wars. However, if you know anything about history, Korea wasn’t too successful the last time around.

  • nhautamaki

    The North Korean govt is crazy all right; crazy as a fox. They have been kicking the hornet’s nest for decades, the thing is, instead of stinging them, the hornets just cough up some honey and hope they’ll go away for a while. You can hardly blame the Kims for being belligerent, bellicose, and obnoxious when that behaviour has been consistently rewarded by aid packages that only allow them to keep their miserable grip on power.

  • bobleeswagger308

    60-years ago today the initial defeat of South Korea was barely 5-months old. The US responded in June, July, and August with mostly untrained, reaf area type troops from Japan and CONUS and were already taking the fight to them. The raggedy-ass bunch of mud-Marines of the 1st. Marine Regiment were trying to fight off the Chineese at the Chosen with the total UN force at around 20,000 and the Chineese numbering 200,000. USMC fought a rear guard battle in retreat and eventually were helped out by 900 rear area Royal Marines and members of the 5th and 7th. Marines. The Chinese with their vastly overwhelming number of assault troops were badly cut up by the marinesand had to withdraw which eventully led to a route. The US fought an excellent war with retread WWII soldiers and Marines during those early days and kept SKorea free. Today we have Tident subs armed with 28, MIRV warhead, missles watching China and NKorea and we don’t have the troops to fight a two ocean war, so you figure it out.

blog comments powered by Disqus