North Korea Nuclear Deja Vu

North Korea dealt the world’s crumbling efforts to contain the nuclear genie yet another body blow when the one-time Hermit Kingdom invited a U.S. scientist to take an inside peek at Pyongyang’s nuclear complex on November 12 – and floored him with a “stunning” new uranium enrichment plant sporting at least 1,000 centrifuges. Not only is President Obama having trouble winning Senate ratification for the New START treaty, but Iran and North Korea suggest his declared goal of a world free of nuclear weapons is either naïve or nonsensical.

-- Institute for Science and International Security

Stanford University professor Siegfried Hecker said in a report released over the weekend that the North Koreans told him it was already producing low-grade uranium, although there was no way to confirm if the plant was fully operational. “It is possible that Pyonyang’s latest moves are directed primarily at eventually generating much-needed electricity,” he wrote in his report. “Yet, the military potential of uranium enrichment technology is serious.”

He elaborated on his visit:

At the fuel fabrication plant we entered what appeared to be a new building about 100 meters long, across from the tall uranium oxide production building. We later identified it as the former metal fuel rod fabrication building, which I had visited in Feb. 2008 to verify their disablement actions. We walked up polished granite steps to the second-floor control room and observation area. The first look through the windows of the observation deck into the two long high-bay areas was stunning. Instead of seeing a few small cascades of centrifuges, which I believed to exist in North Korea, we saw a modern, clean centrifuge plant of more than a thousand centrifuges all neatly aligned and plumbed below us. There were two high-bay areas on each side of the central island. The high-bay areas were two stories high and we were told 50 meters long each. We estimated the width of the bays to be 12 to 15 meters. There were three lines of centrifuge pairs, closely spaced, the entire length of each hall. We were told that they began construction in April 2009 and completed the operations a few days ago. Overhead imagery now shows a building with a blue roof about 120 meters long.

The top U.S. envoy for North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, is meeting with leaders in South Korea, Japan and China this week. Beijing is widely viewed as the only nation with sufficient clout in North Korea – it has subsidized the impoverished nation for years – to alter its path. The report echoes the findings last month of the nuclear experts at the Institute for Science and International Security.

As with Iran’s clandestine nuclear efforts, the U.S. reacted to Pyongyang’s latest disclosure with highly-enriched rhetoric. “He is predictable in his unpredictability,” Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told ABC Sunday. “Not too long ago, he killed 46 South Korean sailors. He has, over time, continued to destabilize this region and, in fact, I also believe that this has to do with the succession plan for his son [Kim Jong-un].”

Perhaps. But this is apparently a long-standing family issue. I can recall flying across the Atlantic with Defense Secretary William Perry in April 1994 and asking him about then-recent U.S. intelligence reports that North Korea had – when Kim Jong-un was the nine-year old grandson of the still-ruling Kim Il-sung – already produced one or two nuclear bombs. (Of course, Kim il-sung would die that July, clearing the way for his son, Kim Jong-il, to succeed him, so maybe there is something to this nuclear-dynasty bit Mullen cites).

“Our policy right along has been oriented to try to keep North Korea from getting a significant nuclear-weapon capability,” Perry said at the time. Meaning an insignificant nuclear capability is OK? “We don’t know anything we can do about that,” the Pentagon chief conceded 16 years ago. “What we can do something about, though is stopping them from building beyond that.” Proliferation experts believe North Korea now has up to a dozen nuclear weapons.

This is the fourth episode of North Korean nuclear brinkmanship – following 1994, 2002 and 2006 – designed to win more economic aid. But this latest go-round has happened more quickly than Western experts predicted, and could lead to accelerated nuclear-weapons production.

Neither the U.S. nor other nuclear powers seems able to stop the atomic seepage that has allowed North Korea and Pakistan to gain nuclear weapons, with Iran apparently close behind. But the fact that North Korea has had nuclear weapons for nearly two decades should help us us keep things in perspective, as Gary Milhollin, then-and-still with the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, pointed out after North Korea gained its first nuke: “If the bomb is in a pleasure craft coming up the Potomac by the Pentagon, then I think Mr. Perry would have to admit one bomb is significant.”

Related Topics: North Korea, nuclear proliferation, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    “But the fact that North Korea has had nuclear weapons for nearly two decades should help us us keep things in perspective”

    Absolutely. Especially given that the U.S. is the only nation to ever use the damned things offensively. The pathological hypocrisy involved is breathtaking.

    As someone who lives within the demonstrated range of NK’s weapons, this is much ado about nothing. Be afraid, be very afraid, say the governments here and there. Keep funneling those tax dollars to empire maintenance (60,000+ troops in Korea and Japan). As if such insanity is sustainable going FWD.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Wow just as there is a -slight-pushback at the cost of the Pentagon this new “threat” gets play.
    .
    Crazy coincidence, no?

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    The Pew Research Center’s latest News IQ Quiz:

    On the subject of government spending, many Americans (77%) are aware that the U.S. has a larger budget deficit today than in the 1990s, yet far fewer correctly answer a question about what the government spends more on: national defense, education, Medicare or interest on the national debt. Roughly equal proportions of Republicans (81%), Democrats (78%) and independents (78%) know that the federal budget deficit is larger now than in the 1990s.

    Overall, 39% of the public know that the government spends more on national defense than on education, Medicare or interest on the national debt. About one-in-four (23%) say the government spends more on interest payments and 15% say Medicare is the largest expenditure of these four alternatives. Government accounting estimates indicate that the government spends about twice as much on defense than on Medicare, and more than four times as much on defense as on interest on the debt.

    More Democrats (46%) than Republicans (28%) know that the government spends more on national defense than the other items listed. Republicans are as likely to say the government spends most on interest on the debt (29%) as on defense (28%). A plurality of independents (44%) know that the government spends most on national defense.

    http://people-press.org/report/677/

  • Art Pepper

    So the biggest obstacles to nuclear non-proliferation right now are Iran, N. Korea, and the U.S. Senate? That sounds about right.

  • Paul-no not that one

    So is that survey an indictment of the American people? Or the media?
    .
    If you follow the link you can take the quiz. It is incredibly basic.

  • apr2563

    Before we have John Bolton, McCain, and all of the other willing warriors calling for us to bomb Korea, I would like someone besides Mr. Hecker looking at verification. However, his organization CISAC seems reputable. The membership doesn’t include any of the usual subjects that I can recognize. It appears to be seeking diplomatic solutions.
    .
    http://cisac.stanford.edu/

  • http://davideconnollyjr.wordpress.com davideconnollyjr

    This stuff had to come from China; not just the materials, but the technical advice on workmanship and concepts. That there is a train which travels continuously between China and North Korea we know; what is being transported on that train at any given time is anyone’s guess. My guess is that China wants a buffer between themselves and democracy. Not so much the United States in particular, but the pressure that would come along with a unified and democratic Korea would threaten the existence of the ultimate good old boys network which is the communist government of China. No more raping the local girls with impunity, no more extortion without fear of the law, no more state provided cars, homes, servants, and salaries, and no more government jobs and appointments for family and friends. Decisions potentially effecting the job security of Chinese government officials like the Tiananmen Square massacre and arming North Korea with nuclear weapons always seem to be the most extreme, and aimed at quelling discussion of the issue ever again. The decision to aggressively assert control over several different islands and waters near other nations is based either on mineral or petroleum deposits, which will help continue the Chinese industrial revolution, and stave off rebellion from the countryside- something Chinese officials definitely view as a threat to their job security. All harsh decisions from Beijing lead back to base motivations derived from Chinese official’s fear of having to give up their undeserved, unquestioned, and absolute power over billions of people, and a percentage of their earnings.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I think it’s a far bigger phenomenon Paul. It reflects the failure of American schools and (therefore) our society. But hell, the oligarchs are rejoicing–the burgeoning class of proles they’ve created respond so much better to propaganda.

    Chris Hedges:

    “We live in two Americas. One America, now the minority, functions in a print-based, literate world. It can cope with complexity and has the intellectual tools to separate illusion from truth. The other America, which constitutes the majority, exists in a non-reality-based belief system. This America, dependent on skillfully manipulated images for information, has severed itself from the literate, print-based culture. It cannot differentiate between lies and truth. It is informed by simplistic, childish narratives and clichés. It is thrown into confusion by ambiguity, nuance and self-reflection. This divide, more than race, class or gender, more than rural or urban, believer or nonbeliever, red state or blue state, has split the country into radically distinct, unbridgeable and antagonistic entities.

    There are over 42 million American adults, 20 percent of whom hold high school diplomas, who cannot read, as well as the 50 million who read at a fourth- or fifth-grade level. Nearly a third of the nation’s population is illiterate or barely literate. And their numbers are growing by an estimated 2 million a year. But even those who are supposedly literate retreat in huge numbers into this image-based existence. A third of high school graduates, along with 42 percent of college graduates, never read a book after they finish school. Eighty percent of the families in the United States last year did not buy a book.”

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20081110_america_the_illiterate/

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Yep. Thats it in a nut shell. And the US Senate is the body I’d be most worried about when it comes to deciding to use one or two of those nukes.

  • gpanfile

    The relative ‘amorality’ of the Chinese leadership has one clear result at least: being much better at strategy than ideologues of the democratic, theocratic, or communistic ilk. One also wonders if most Chinese people would rather have, say, a car and refrigerator, or the privilege of voting for the likes of, name one, Sharron Angle, Sarah Palin, Christine O’Donnell.

    Since the days of Deng and the death of ideology in China, the plan has always been to proliferate nukes to loose cannon regimes whose main opponents were economic rivals of China. This on the theory that at least such rivals would be harassed… India by Pakistan, the US and Japan by the NoKos. At most, one or more nukes untraceable to China, for which China would not be held to account by any other nuclear power, would go off, to the severe detriment of one of China’s major economic rivals.

    These guys play a way deeper, longer term game for keeps than the US is capable of, at this point. Just win, baby.

  • newfreedomblog

    “As with Iran’s clandestine nuclear efforts, the U.S. reacted to Pyongyang’s latest disclosure with highly-enriched rhetoric. “He is predictable in his unpredictability,” Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told ABC Sunday. “Not too long ago, he killed 46 South Korean sailors. He has, over time, continued to destabilize this region and, in fact, I also believe that this has to do with the succession plan for his son [Kim Jong-un].”

    .
    As with Iran’s clandestine nuclear efforts. As with North Korea’s clandestine nuclear efforts. So go most of the smaller wanna-be governments of the world. It is like an incessant attention seeking child. You placate them by giving them something they want, or you ignore them. We have played the game of giving them what they want for the most part for the past 70+ odd years. If we ignore them, then they will ratchet up the attention seeking behaviors. The problem for us and North Korea lies with China. Pressure on the Chinese by us to limit or stop all trade with them ought to do the trick. Kill two birds with one stone. Stop trade with China, open up factories here in our own country and put people to work.
    .
    Part of me says, so what if they have all of these nukes, what good does it do them? If you are not going to take the measures necessary to stop them in their tracks, then move our soldiers out of that region and let the South Koreans and Japanese defend themselves. If they decide to attack North Korea, so be it.
    .
    North Korea is just another country with a crazed Dictator at the throne of power. The people in North Korea suffer endlessly. I watched a powerful documentary about North Korea. They are basically all brainwashed. The torment and torture for the past 70+ years has taken it’s toll on these people. They are mindless robots.

  • http://shortplaysaboutrealpeople.wordpress.com Michael Maiello

    Obviously any nuclear weapon is serious stuff but I think there’s a false notion, at least in the public mind, that even one nuclear weapon is a great equalizer. It really isn’t. With one, you can do something terrible, yes. But the global or U.S. retaliation would present something of an existential crisis and everybody knows it. Heck, even during World War II, when only the U.S. had atomic weapons they were used twice in order to convince the world that there was more than one.

  • gmalcolms

    @jcapan
    “A third of high school graduates, along with 42 percent of college graduates, never read a book after they finish school.”

    So a higher percentage of high school graduates who don’t graduate from college read a book after they finish school than those high school graduates who go on to graduate from college? That doesn’t seem very plausible.

  • michaelfury

    Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

    - Matthew 7:5

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/circle-ix/

blog comments powered by Disqus