The Supremes Let `Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Stand For Now

If it’s Friday, it’s time for another dispatch from the high court on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Last Friday, a pro-gay Republican group seeking to overturn the ban on gay men and women serving openly in the U.S. military asked the Supreme Court to bar enforcement of the 17-year old law while the Justice Department appeals a federal judge’s ruling that it is unconstitutional. Friday afternoon, the high court rejected the request from the Log Cabin Republicans without comment.

“With the likelihood of Congress repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ fading with each passing day, judicial relief continues to be perhaps the most viable avenue for ending this unconstitutional policy,” says lawyer Dan Woods, who is representing Log Cabin Republicans. “We and Log Cabin Republicans will continue to fight on to protect the constitutional rights of all Americans who want to serve in our military without regard to their sexual orientation.”

But those supporting the ban were pleased by the high court’s action. “I am gratified that two higher courts have now recognized the importance of judicial deference to Congress, the President, and military leaders in setting policy for the armed forces,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council and a Marine veteran. “I hope, and remain confident, that they will do the same in ruling on the merits of this case.”

The grim news for gay advocates is becoming increasingly clear: with Congress unlikely to lift the ban, the highest court — which has always granted the military a wide berth in running its own operations — is unlikely to step in and do what the politicians won’t.

Related Topics: don't ask don't tell, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • formerlyjames

    What a surprise. The Roman Catholic Supremes and Obama agree. Wait and see, twiddle de de. It would be no surprise if this court held rescinding DADT, if that ever happens, to be unconstitutional. The Vatican lawyers are working on an amicus brief just in case.

  • textee

    For those not counting, this is post no. 1,000,001 (this week!) from Time magazine pushing for “Gay Pride” parades at United States military installations.

    Can we get a piece from Time magazine promoting the position that Captain Joe Blow’s four male “spouses” should be entitled to the same benefits as other United States military spouses? If not, why not?

  • formerlyjames

    I believe that the subject is a current top news topic, and each post has commented on a current development, including the remarks of the fascist Marine Corps. Commandant whose name I don’t remember nor care about. I missed any that have been about military installation “Gay Pride” parades on which you repeatedly remark. A figment of your imagination perhaps? I will continue to search for that as it would be interesting. I would be opposed to such display, by the way.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    The Roman Catholic Supremes…
    .
    Were 5 of the 9 Justices black, would you assume the Court was informed by its blackness?

  • formerlyjames

    Interesting question. I don’t know. Probably my answer would be a qualified yes, but possibly no. The point I make is that judges are a product of their personal lives and beliefs. Being African-American is a much more broad perspective than being Roman Catholic and probably not as confining. For true believers religious theology trumps all (note “true”, which ironically did not apply to JFK who suffered the most scrutiny on the issue). But, flailing, to draw on the current court, Clarence Thomas, I honestly don’t think of his race, but I do his right wing beliefs, his hypocrisy, his arrogance and self-rightousness, all associated in my mind with religion.
    .
    So much for not answering your question, but thanks for causing me further thought, as always. We have had similar discussions before, and all I know is that I am very, very anti-religion. That is based on experience, not just random fad.

  • formerlyjames

    Of course 5 are the only ones I have objection politically with, but theologically, there are 7. Or is it 6? Anyway, more than 5, and an overwhelming majority.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    I would rebut that judges, the individuals, are are a product of their personal lives and beliefs. Good judges are a product of the law.

  • Asharaxx

    Textee, wetting himself over something he made up? That never happens.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    A current news topic pushed by the ever obedient, kneebending, eggsucking liberal lapdog media. Instead of keeping America informed on the current status of the war, and condition of our brave men and women, let’s keep the world aprised on the rights of a scant few carpet munchers and c@cksuckers! Where’s the ongoing body count that we had during the last administration?

  • Asharaxx

    Gosh, thirds. Status of the war and our brave men and women, like the post two down from this one?
    .
    Also, nice job with the insults. Those you vomited at make up some of ‘our brave men and women’.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Signifigant numbers asshat, or an extremely small minority?
    .
    My insults stand, and can include you if you so choose.

  • Asharaxx

    Doesn’t matter. It’s still great that you insult and degrade people who are better than you, and whose efforts you benefit from.
    .
    “asshat” “and can include you if you so choose.”
    .
    Got ahead of yourself there, genius.

blog comments powered by Disqus