Turning Chinese Tables

Thomas P.M. Barnett is an old Pentagon hand and heavy-duty national-security thinker. He’s perplexed by a glaring omission in Tuesday’s front-page New York Timespiece on the growing distrust expressed by young Chinese military officers towards the U.S.

“This is the same U.S. military that assembles multinational war games in China’s front yard and sells advanced weaponry to a small island nation off its coast–in addition to anyone else who will buy it in the region (and yes, business is very good right now, as weapons purchases are up 100% over the past half decade),” he writes in his blog. “Are we honestly that clueless or has our disingenuity broken through to some higher, slightly irrational plane?”

He then details how things might look if China were doing in our neighborhood what we are now doing in theirs:

Follow me into this brave, alternative world:

– Imagine the Chinese navy holding multinational exercises with the Cubans and Venezuelans and Nicaraguans (a silly sight, I know) in the waters around Cuba, while Beijing warns us subtly that their 1979 Cuba Defense Act will be pursued to the ultimate vigor required, including the sale of advanced attack aircraft to the Cuban air force.

– Imagine Chinese carriers conducting such operations, sporting aircraft and weaponry that could rain destruction over most of the continental U.S. at a moment’s notice.

– Imagine Chinese spy craft patrolling the edge of our local waters and flying around the rim of our airspace.

– Imagine the Chinese selling all sorts of missile defense to Venezuela and other allies “scared of rising American militarism.”

– Imagine weapons purchases throughout Latin America doubling in five years time, with China supplying most of the goods.

– Imagine Chinese naval bases and marine barracks doting the Latin American landscape and Caribbean archipelago.

– Imagine a Cuban missile crisis-like event in the mid-1990s, which led the Chinese military to propose a new evolution in their warfare since. (A reference to the Taiwan Strait crises of 1995-96)

– Imagine the Chinese military conducting regime toppling events in the Middle East, involving countries upon whom our energy dependency is dramatically and permanently rising, while China actually gets the vast bulk of its oil from non-Persian Gulf sources like Canada, Mexico, Latin America, Africa and itself.

– Imagine the Chinese government demanding that the Chinese military produce an elaborate report every year detailing the “disturbing” rise of U.S. military power.

– Imagine the Chinese military announcing their new military doctrine of attack from the sea and air, with their documents chock full of bombing maps of U.S. military installations that are widely dispersed across the entirety of the continental United States, meaning their new war doctrine has–at its core–the complete destruction of U.S. military assets on our territory as the opening bid.

– Imagine the U.S. military stating that this new doctrine of attacking the entirety of the U.S. territory is necessary to maintaining the regional balance of power in the Western hemisphere, because the U.S. Navy has–in an “unprovoked” and “provocative” manner, begun significant patrolling operations in the Caribbean Basin, whose waters constitute a “profound” national interest to the Chinese.

– Imagine this series of developments unfolding over close to two decades, as China, having lost its familiar great-power war foe, the Soviet Union, firmly glommed onto the U.S. as a replacement enemy image.

– Imagine all that, and then imagine how the U.S. military views the Chinese military.

– Imagine if the Chinese military offered military-to-military ties under such conditions. (Something the U.S. has been seeking.)

What do you think the U.S. Congress would say to that? Would it be considered “caving in” to Chinese pressure?

The truth, unexplored in this otherwise fine article, is that the U.S. military needs–and has needed–rising China as an enemy image for more than a decade-and-a-half now, so I don’t know how we can expect anything from young Chinese officers other than returning the favor.

Related Topics: China, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    The inability to see our actions as viewed from outside seems to be built into our character. In other contexts its called “American exceptionalism”

  • newfreedomblog

    – Imagine the Chinese buying up all of our assets, Real Estate (Empire State Building), our Oil reserves and anything else they can get at these now bargain basement prices.
    .
    Sometimes we can sell military goods to our potential enemies and friends, sometimes we just give them the keys to the entire country, and invite them right through the front door.

  • GivenUp

    To be fair, the US has not been in the habit of annexing it’s neighbors (the whole regime change bit in Latin America undermines that but we never incorporated the territories) nor do we deny the sovereignty of Cuba. Or for that matter oppress our own populace and jail Nobel Peace Prize winners for speaking out against the government.
    .
    Not that their hostility isn’t understandable given US actions but this is a false equivalence.
    .
    Also I suspect the Chinese have their own report on the US military, they just don’t publicize it.

  • GivenUp

    You do realize that in the worst case scenario this means nothing right? When a country goes to war with another this is usually followed rather closely by a confiscation of all property owned by that country and its nationals.
    .
    The more property the Chinese own in the US the less likely they will want to risk it all by starting a war.

  • kbanginmotown

    Thanks for this disturbing reality check, Mark.
    .
    Re:

    The truth, unexplored in this otherwise fine article, is that the U.S. military needs–and has needed–rising China as an enemy image for more than a decade-and-a-half now, so I don’t know how we can expect anything from young Chinese officers other than returning the favor.

    Does the military have some sort of playbook, e.g. “The Care and Feeding of your Next Enemy” that it uses to make sure we have a steady supply of bogeymen?
    .
    Lastly, the statement “Imagine the U.S./Chinese military…” is used for emphasis, but how many of these actions were/are initiated by the US military and how many by the administration? I’d like to think that the President could keep the sabre-rattling to a minimum when there is no immediate threat.

  • newfreedomblog

    I apologize, I thought the Chinese had bought a large interest in the ESB. But, the owner, Anthony Malkin only celebrated the accomplishments of Mao Zedong. The Chinese did purchase an oil company in Texas recently.

  • GivenUp

    The military has no such playbook, it’s their job to see who might be an enemy so that is the lens through which they view the world. “When all you have is a hammer the whole world looks like a nail”
    .
    That is why we have civilian control of the military.

  • afguy

    GivenUp,
    .
    It’s the “Industrial” part of the MIC that needs a “bogeyman” to justify all of the research into the next “latest and greatest” weapons.
    .
    A bunch of cave-dwellers with AK-47s won’t generate much to justify a missile defense system, but a “rising China”… now THAT’S a differrent matter entirely.
    .
    And if you can manage to have BOTH of those at the same time with differing force and equipment requirements, you can demand spending on pretty much ANYTHING you can visualize.

  • charlieromeobravo

    This is painfully true. One would think that, at the very least, after 9/11 we’d be a little better at thinking about perceptions beyond our own but we seem to be doomed to learn lessons the hard way.
    .
    Iran is another good example. To put it mildly, Iran hasn’t been friendly towards the US for decades. Then we start conducting wars to their immediate east and immediate west and then we act indignant and get threatening when they start to act twitchy.
    .
    The US often acts as though it’s obvious and self evident to everyone that we are Good and the countries we are at odds with are Bad and by extension every action we take is correct, well meaning, and best for everyone. This was practically the Bush administration’s foreign policy motto.

  • GivenUp

    I’m a bit too optimistic to view this as something that is done consciously.
    The people who work for these companies have to come up with a product they think might be necessary given the situations in which the military finds itself (not to mention one that they might be able to sell)
    .
    The effects of the two might be much the same but I do not like to ascribe it to any kind of conspiracy, especially when it does not seem necessary
    .
    I will concede that this sort of thinking can of course lead to a self fulfilling prophecy.

  • allthingsinaname

    More Babel?

  • destor23

    Though to be fair, we should recognize what China is doing and how it’s setting itself up for the future by:

    1) Signing deals to secure itself mineral rights and development right with thugs and warlords throughout Sudan and the rest of sub-Saharan Africa.

    2) Supplying AK-47s and cheap weapons systems to said thugs and warlords.

    3) Selling cheap defensive technology around the world in an effort to undermine U.S. airpower.

    4) Continuing, unapologetically, its occupation of Tibet.

    5) Continuing to threaten and menace Taiwan.

    6) Securing mineral and resource rights with the governments of Afghanistan and Iraq even as the U.S. shoulders the entire burden of maintaining the legitimacy of those governments.

  • allthingsinaname

    Imagine Pakistan, India, N Korea, being in our Hemisphere

  • afguy

    If we go back thru history and look at our conduct toward them since the ’40′s, we’ll understand why it is they harbor a certain “hostility” toward us.
    .
    Lord knows, we’ve worked hard enough to earn it.

  • afguy

    It’s now widely known that the CIA over-estimated the capabilities of the USSR for years in order to assure funding for their pet “projects”. We relied on them for our assessments regarding funding for a number of areas.
    .
    Don’t think that someone, with stock in a number of defense-related companies, wouldn’t “color” their findings, knowing that it would lead to the building of certain “necessary” weapons systems or fund research in certain areas that would, just coincidentally, make them quite wealthy thru their investments?

  • sacredh

    Is this a thinly disguised Palin geography joke?

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Actually, none of those points would matter to the reason why the Chinese military doesn’t trust the US. Yes, that’s the counter argument of why we do stuff like this, but I’m not convinced the Chinese military would understand why we would oppose them controlling the lands of their ancestors. Then again, I think most New World nations have a bit of difficulty understanding the need for Old World nations to haggle this much over these ancestral territories- eg: India and Pakistan.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    On the one hand, at least the Chinese don’t appear to be laying the groundwork for an alliance with our neighbors to the south…
    -
    But on the other hand, they looked mad! We better triple the rest of the world put together on war spending– doubling it just isn’t safe enough!
    -

  • afguy

    The more property the Chinese own in the US the less likely they will want to risk it all by starting a war.
    .
    The more the Chinese own in the US, the less likely they’ll HAVE to resort to war to get what they want down the road.
    .
    It’s NOT the real estate they own that should worry us – it’s the government securities and share of our debt they own. All they will have to do is squeeze a little, then stand back and watch…

  • herby002

    7.1 – Sacredh,
    “Is this a thinly disguised Palin geography joke?”

    ‘I can see Beijing from my porch on Mount Whitney!’

  • allthingsinaname

    No, a slam against the author and his Lennon-ism.
    .
    Plain can imagine whatever she wants as she is not in touch with reality.

blog comments powered by Disqus