Charlie Wilson's War II

One of the most interesting stories I covered in Washington three decades ago, while working for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, was Texas congressman Charlie Wilson’s effort to help the mujahedeen drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. It was a heck of a tale, one Hollywood turned into Charlie Wilson’s War, starring Tom Hanks, three years ago.

U.S. Rep. Charlie Wilson, D-Lufkin/AP

The good news this week is that Mike Vickers, who worked closely with the Democratic lawmaker to force the Russians back home with their tanks between their legs (Vickers was the chess-player in the film), just won an important promotion. President Obama has nominated him to the post of under secretary of defense for intelligence.

Vickers is currently serving, according to his official Pentagon web page, as the “Asst Sec of Defense for Spec Ops/Low-Intensity Conflict & Interdependent Capabilities.” He spent nearly 15 years in Army special forces and the CIA. “His operational experience spans covert action and espionage, unconventional warfare, counter-terrorism (including hostage rescue operations), counterinsurgency, and foreign internal defense,” his bio reads. “During the mid-1980s, Mr. Vickers was the principal strategist for the largest covert action program in the CIA’s history: the paramilitary operation that drove the Soviet army out of Afghanistan.”

Mike Vickers/DoD

But the good news concerning Vickers’ ascent won’t blunt the short-changing Congress is doing to Iraq. “You can argue about the war all day long, but the fact is, we’ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars on this war,” Defense Secretary Robert Gates noted Tuesday. “We’re now in the endgame. We are leaving. We are making a transition to a civilian-dominated process of development, of helping build institutions and so on.” Gates complained that Congress has taken a “huge whack” out of the State Department’s request for civilian development in Iraq, with one committee cutting a $2 billion effort in half.

“It is one of these cases where, having invested an enormous amount of money, we are now arguing about a tiny amount of money in terms of bringing this to a successful conclusion,” Gates said. “It reminds me for all the world of the last scene in Charlie Wilson’s War, where, having forced the Soviets out of Afghanistan and having spent billions to do it, Charlie Wilson can’t get a million dollars for schools.” It’s a good thing Charlie died in February at 76, so he won’t have to watch the sequel.

Related Topics: charlie wilson. mike vickers, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • Paul-no not that one

    “a $2 billion effort ”
    .
    “we are now arguing about a tiny amount of money”-Gates
    .
    I note that it is “a” not “the”. How many other tiny amounts is he looking for?

  • destor23

    Good thing there were no negative repercussions from our decision to arm and train the mujahedeen so that we could stick it to the Soviets.

    Nope, not one negative repercussion.

    It was a really smart move!

    Nothing bad happened to us because of it.

    Not a thing.

  • afguy

    “Self-inflicted foot injuries” – a short-and-sweet summary of our foreign policy history in that part of the world.

  • queencersei

    Send in Greg Mortonsen. He is an expert on building schools in that part of the world. And he can do it on the cheap too.

  • certifiablylazy

    Don’t forget Dick and Saddam.

  • afguy

    Gotta start back in the late ’40s/early ’50s with Mossadegh in Iran and go forward.
    .
    ‘Course, the British flavored and stirred the stew too.
    .
    Kinda like the French did for us in… what’s the name of that country… it’s right on the tip of my tongue.

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Juan Valdez

    Forever fighting monsters of our own creation.

  • afguy

    Bingo!!

  • apr2563

    Juan: You are so right. Our history never seems to inform our decisions.

  • formerlyjames

    No mention of the Jimmy Carter administration which in fact facilitated the most destructive and far reaching foreign intervention in history? Nor his Polish “security” advisor Z. Brzezinski (sp? lol). All of these good ol’ country boys ignited the most devastating world repercussions ever and forever, maybe after the establishment of Israel. The Nobel Peace Prize, indeed, Pffffftttttt. I didn’t know this Vickers fool, but would urge him to give us a break and either join good ol’ Charlie, or Jimmy in their current irrelevant states.

  • formerlyjames

    Further, ever notice that butt- in- ski Carter is welcomed all over the world carrying his various concerns for human rights? Even North Korea. But…it’ll be a cold day in hell when there is a welcome for him in Russia, even in it’s post communist state. And Russians are used to cold, just not his variety.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    To Wilson’s credit, he knew what Afghanistan needed for it’s uneducated, struggling and very impoverished population – far more impoverished after fighting the Soviets: Civilian aid.
    .
    American foreign policy: Tens of billions of dollars for weapons are just dandy, but a few million dollars for school, roads and civilian police are way too expensive.
    .
    Had Wilson succeeded in his later plans for winning the peace in Afghanistan, we would never have had 9/11.
    .
    I wish that our horrible foreign policy was only a Republican problem, but, the Military Industrial complex owns both parties and money to win the peace just doesn’t have a prayer of winning without jealous Americans demanding that everything in America be perfect before we send a significant amount of civilian aid to any country.

  • perrywhite1

    American foreign policy: Tens of billions of dollars for weapons are just dandy, but a few million dollars for school, roads and civilian police are way too expensive.

    I agree. But that statement is also true of our domestic budget. Billions available for weapons systems we don’t need, but S-chip? Social Security? Medicare? Infrastructure? We can’t afford that! Those programs must be cut to pay for all our wars!

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    American foreign policy: Tens of billions of dollars for weapons are just dandy, but a few million dollars for school, roads and civilian police are way too expensive.
    .
    .
    That’s the domestic policy as well. Military is good. War is good. Educating the populace is bad.

  • carding3

    I was based in Paris at the time news broke that we were aiding the mujahadeen to defeat Soviet forces in Afghanistan. “What a great idea!”, someone said at a dinner party. As a veteran observer of the Middle East, I raised the question: “And what happens when they kick the Russians out and turn on us?”
    I was immediately poo-pooed as a cynic.

blog comments powered by Disqus