"Star Wars" flying laser — 0-for-5 this month

It was the late Ted Kennedy who galvanized his fellow Democrats at their 1980 convention by pledging “the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.” Thirty years later, the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency seems to have adopted those stirring words as its own. You may recall the Pentagon’s Airborne Laser program, which has crammed a chemical laser into the belly of a modified 747 aircraft. Earlier this year, it fired a basketball-size beam traveling 670 million m.p.h. (1,078 million km/h) — the speed of light — to destroy a fake enemy missile over the Pacific. “There’s nothing like flaming wreckage” to prove such lasers are not science fiction, an engineer involved in the program said.

But Defense Secretary Robert Gates killed MDA’s Airborne Laser production program last year, scaling it back to a modest research effort. Yet the guys running it have been trying hard to show its merit, so they’ve scheduled more such tests. The next one is designed to double the distance between the 747 and its target to about 100 miles. Unfortunately, they’re not having much luck.

The next shootdown was supposed to take place in early August, “We had a target issue,” Army Lieut. General Patrick O’Reilly, the MDA boss, noted August 17. “It wasn’t even the target, it was the stand that holds the target up, so we didn’t conduct that test.” So they slipped the test to August 15. “We didn’t do it because there was a software module that operates some of our tracking systems,” O’Reilly said of the second attempt, before adding a key caveat: “that do not directly have to do with the laser.” So the engineers rescheduled the test for August 18, but that test was scrapped because of “a problem with the tracking camera cooling system.”

Getting into the swing of things, MDA cancelled the test set for last Sunday before it happened. “A hot bypass valve on the aircraft is in an abnormal condition thus not allowing for proper component cooling,” the agency said. “A new date for the experiment will be set for the upcoming week.” That date was Tuesday, but it had to be canceled “because of unsuccessful tracking beam calibration engagements.” Yet once again there was some good news buried in the terse MDA statement: “The target missile was not launched,” meaning the laser wasn’t tested, meaning the test didn’t fail. And it appears MDA has decided to take a breather, not specifying when the next try will be: “Program officials will determine the next opportunity to conduct the experiment.”

So what, if anything, do these five snafus in a row tell us? First, you’ve got to give credit to an entity that forthrightly acknowledges when things don’t go right. Secondly, it is fair to note that these problems don’t actually appear to involve the laser itself, but all the infrastructure associated with such a complex test, and the desire to learn as much as possible from it. Finally, it should remind us of just how challenging missile development — by either the good or the bad guys — is. Much of the justification for U.S. missile defenses is based on the threat posed by North Korea. As Kim Jong-il travels to China aboard a train that looks like Strelnikov’s from Doctor Zhivago, it’s something to keep in mind.

Related Topics: airborne laser, missile defense, National Security
  • Latest on Battleland

    Army photo / Sgt. Michael J. MacLeod

    Humpin’ It…And Jammin’ It…

    Reuters

    China’s ‘Security Dilemma’ Risks Arms Race in Asia

    TOKYO – A shooting war with China may not be inevitable, but a dangerous arms escalation seems a dead certainty. That’s the take from a rare public discussion here this week among naval experts from Japan, the U.S. and China.

    Chris Hondros / Getty Images

    Mental Ills Top Reason U.S. Troops Now Hospitalized

    Four of the top five non-combat medical conditions sending troops to the hospital in 2011 were mental ailments, the Pentagon reports:

  • kbanginmotown

    The advantage Kim Jong-il has it that a “miss” is still a “hit” in the minds of many people. (Although he has shown that he can sink a ship.)
    .
    Any word on how negotiations are going with NK?

  • allthingsinaname

    Last I heard 2009, is that the ABL was 8 years behind with a 4 billion cost overrun. This seems a bit much for what is an essentially a line of sight system.

    I am all for research and development, and the benefits it can bring, but I wonder if the money could be better spent.

  • michaelfury

    “There’s nothing like flaming wreckage”

    Nope. Nothing like it.

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/signs-and-wonders/

  • udaymeduri

    You missed a million in your conversion from mph to kph.

  • pintortwo

    My understanding is that the problem with an Airborne Laser System is the range (the laser loses power over distance). According to a study from the American Physical Society:
    .
    The Airborne Laser currently in development has the potential to intercept liquid-propellant ICBMs, but its range would be limited and it would therefore be vulnerable to counterattack. The Airborne Laser would not be able to disable solid-propellant ICBMs at ranges useful for defending the United States.
    .
    “Few of the components exist for deploying an effective boost-phase defense against liquid-propellant ICBMs and some essential components would take at least 10 years to develop,” said Study Group co-chair Daniel Kleppner. “According to U.S. intelligence estimates, North Korea and Iran could develop or acquire solid-propellant ICBMs within the next 10 to 15 years. Consequently, a boost-phase defense effective only against liquid-propellant ICBMs would risk being obsolete when deployed.”
    (link)
    .
    .
    ..and that it’s just not operationally feasible. Sec Def Robert Gates said before the House:
    .
    “I don’t know anybody at the Department of Defense…who thinks that this program should, or would, ever be operationally deployed. The reality is that you would need a laser something like 20 to 30 times more powerful than the chemical laser in the plane right now to be able to get any distance from the launch site to fire…And if you were to operationalize this you would be looking at 10 to 20 747s, at a billion and a half dollars apiece, and $100 million a year to operate,” Gates told members of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. He added that “the operational concept…would have required…an orbit almost entirely within the borders” of a rogue nation which was “probably a little problematic.” (to follow)
    .
    Has anything changed?

  • pintortwo
  • michaelfury

    As one who has “scoured the skies” and “taken an F-16 jet fighter for a spin”, what do you make of this, Mr. Thompson? (from a “national security” perspective, of course):

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/blue-skies-from-pain/

  • sacredh

    The laser works but pretty much everything else doesn’t that it is dependent upon? Do we get a discount if we buy them in bulk?

  • sacredh

    I’ll bet the Smithsonian is already trying to figure out where they can display them.

  • centfan

    Are you trying to tell me that with hundreds of commercial flights in the air at any given time they can’t find a way for three hundred passengers eating airline food to generate a vast amount of chemical energy in an effective, efficient manner to completely protect the required airspace?

  • 11charlie

    I think a better place would be the Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson. Put it right next to the XB-70.

  • 11charlie

    “‘A hot bypass valve on the aircraft is in an abnormal condition thus not allowing for proper component cooling,’ the agency said.”

    Luckily they were able to fix it with some gauze pads, WD-40, and ball bearings.

  • rogelio007

    This fantasy will never work. It is a scam intended to make money – for government bureaucrats and defense contractors.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Look at all you commie libs! I bet you want Gorbachev and those sneaky Soviet’s to send missiles in to destroy this here U S of A!
    .
    In just ten years we’ll be able to tell those there commies in Russia to take their nuke ul lar missiles and shove em where the sun don’t shine!
    .
    And from there, we’re gonna bring Democracy and capitalism to that Soviet commie union by 1987.
    .
    Oh, sorry.
    .
    Date this entry back to 1988 or earlier when we, actually, had an enemy who was both ready and potentially ready to use ICBMs to kill us.
    .
    How about lasers which find Al Qada members at the speed of light? I bet the DoD will be half way towards being ready to fight for that twenty years after Islamic terrorism burns itself out in, maybe, 2050.
    .
    DoD: Solving twenty year old problems today.
    .
    I wonder if these lasers can shoot down one of the V2 rockets Hitler used or if that is asking too much.

  • apr2563

    My brother was an engineer at Boeings for over 30 years. He worked on laser armaments used not only from aircraft but from satillites. He had many meetings with the Pentagon years ago promoting investment in this technology. As he could tell you, Boeings likes things to work but are more interested in getting that contract for research and development.

  • Mark Thompson

    Thanks!

blog comments powered by Disqus